Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (30) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48466 
Subject: Re: SCOTUS finds immunity for offiical Pres acts
Date: 07/01/2024 2:51 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
Me too. I know it's somewhat hyperbolic, but could this ruling make it possible for the POTUS to order a SEAL team to kill a US citizen?

I don't think so. Not only does the President lack any authority to do that, but in fact an extrajudicial killing would be clearly unconstitutional. It wouldn't be an official act within his Constitutional authority (the innermost circle), or an official act to which a presumption of immunity would apply (the second circle). Seems like that would pretty clearly be an unofficial act.

Plus, don't forget that the immunity being discussed would only apply to the President. So matter what outcome was reached with the President (again, I think under this ruling he would have no immunity), everyone else would be subject to prosecution. So the shooter would be guilty of first degree murder, as would (probably) all of the other members of the Seal team that participated in the effort. Probably everyone in the chain of command between the President and the Seal team would be guilty of conspiracy to commit, in addition to a host of other lesser crimes.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (30) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds