Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |
Author: Mark ☼  😊 😞
Number: of 22347 
Subject: Re: De-risk a bit?
Date: 06/14/26 9:08 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
My first thought was to just sell around $600k per year to keep cap gains under 15%, but because of the position size that will take many years and could introduce more risk/stress/worry.

More like 18.8% if you include the NIIT that will be due on much of the $600k of LTCG.

Do a big, one time divestment of Berkshire, which will trigger massive cap gains taxes and a large increase in income and taxes from interest on the new cash.

This is probably the worst choice of all. Especially if you already "older" (let's say >60). Not only will you owe a ton of capital gains tax right now, but all that cash when invested in T-bills will throw off so much interest each year that will be taxed at your highest marginal ordinary income rate. In fact, after taxes and inflation, your net yield will be negative most of the time (because taxes are applied on nominal, while inflation eats away the whole amount).

We have two working age kids with good jobs, and would like to pass some on to them at some point.

That point should be now. For a few reasons. One, because they can make better use of the money now than in 20+ years when they are already fully established financially. You should be giving each kid (and their spouse), and your wife should be giving each kid (and their spouse) $19k a year. And the best way to do it is to give them appreciated shares of Berkshire. And two, if they decide to sell it, then they may still be in the 0% long-term capital gains tax bracket. Now THAT is tax efficiency. And three, once there are grandchildren, you can fund various savings plans for them as well, for example, the new child savings accounts ($1k up front plus $5k a year or something like that), or 529 plans to help fund their college expenses.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Mark here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,850 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 58 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 55 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community