Post #20341 by Lapsody on the Berkshire Hathaway board

Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (28)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 5

Ok, I'll take one: I think the more recent example of this, the 16 "nobel prize economist" letter (more crap from supposedly experts) shows that they continue the same playbook of lying to support their guy. Luckily or maybe because the elevation of the poor debate performance,

So what's the lie? Your haven't shown us any lie at all. You've merely called it crap and stated "they continue the same playbook of lying". And the letter came out ahead of the debate, so your statement, "Luckily or maybe because the elevation of the poor debate performance," appears mistaken on the timing.

So because you don't explain why the letter is a lie, are we to think there was no letter when there absolutely was a letter? Am I to think you are lying about a lie? Too much effort for too little.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (28)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Berkshire Hathaway FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.