Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
No. of Recommendations: 0
No. of Recommendations: 1
Both places would fit. Atheist Shrewds is appropriate for anything, really.
Interesting. It wasn't clear to me that this was a concern, though. If the mRNA is still in the blood, than it is still triggering antibodies? (Not a bio-guy.) Fortunately the mRNA isn't the actual disease, so it shouldn't make you sick regardless. As I understand it.
No. of Recommendations: 7
I've read about John Campbell before. First, he's not a medical doctor but has a doctorate in nursing education. And he's been fact checked previously for false COVID-related claims, including promoting two weak studies he said provided 'powerful' and 'overwhelming' evidence that Ivermectin works to combat the disease. Another that incorrectly implied that the vaccine caused a wide range of health problems. Second, I never accept anything on YouTube at face value; in fact, I never click on a YouTube link after having found most of them to be worthless. YMMV.
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/scicheck-evidenc...https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/scicheck-posts-m...
No. of Recommendations: 2
"First, he's not a medical doctor but has a doctorate in nursing education. And he's been fact checked previously for false COVID-related claims, including promoting two weak studies he said provided 'powerful' and 'overwhelming' evidence that Ivermectin works to combat the disease."
Interesting, I've heard of him and have seen a few of his video's at the beginning of the pandemic. As I recall, he was providing world wide stats on COVID at that time.
Thanks for the links, interesting read as well.
No. of Recommendations: 1
The truly chilling discovery is that spreading misinformation to folks who can't think critically can be a gold mine...
As of January 2023, John Campbells YouTube channel had 2.65 million subscribers and over 598 million views.
How many views would he have if he were providing honest, fact based information?
No. of Recommendations: 1
Since we're on the subject of mRNA vaccines, I have a naïve question about them. The mRNA enters a person's cells' cytoplasm (not the nucleus!) and is used there to create the viral spike proteins that are then "expressed" on the cells' surfaces where they trigger the immune system to create antibodies to combat the foreign proteins. So does that mean that the cells that expressed the spike protein are seen as the virus and attacked and killed? My first thought is that this might be bad, but perhaps it's just the collateral damage needed to gain protection and the effect is limited to simply feeling under the weather for a day or two as many people (but not all) do after getting an mRNA vaccine.
No. of Recommendations: 4
Interesting. It wasn't clear to me that this <mRNA> was a concern, though.
On my list of concerns, it ranks right up there with cancer caused by windmill noise.
No. of Recommendations: 0
Yeah, I wasn't losing any sleep over it.
In fact, we plan to get our boosters next week. We actually got COVID last fall, so had to wait several months to get the booster.
No. of Recommendations: 5
As of January 2023, John Campbells YouTube channel had 2.65 million subscribers and over 598 million views.
How many views would he have if he were providing honest, fact based information?
Just ask the powers that be at Fox News. Being truthful and honest about the results of the 2020 presidential election was losing viewers to the news sources that insisted the election had been stolen from Trump. Didn't take them long to decide that supporting their stock price was far more important than supporting the truth.
