Post #13142 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (134)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 6

I can live with the shaming <ha> if the alternative is to see resources denied to citizens to pay for unlimited refugees; or if the alternative is to see NYPD cops being beaten by criminals who should never be here; or seeing victims of scooter gangs being dragged around, and so on.

Fortunately, the choice is never between two absolutes. You can have a system that vets, processes, and either removes or accepts people that are claiming refugee status. As long as you have the infrastructure and resources aligned to the needs you're facing (large numbers of asylees voluntarily turning themselves in for processing) rather than the needs of decades past (almost entirely people trying to sneak over the border undetected), you can avoid having all those resources being drained and get people in or out of the country very quickly.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (134)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.