Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86278 
Subject: Re: The ballroom, another Trump FAIL
Date: 04/01/26 1:18 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Which would be why all that needs to happen is for Congress to appropriate exactly 1 penny to the renovation of the ballroom. There's your statutory authorization.

Well, that only authorizes the Administration to spend one penny. Per the judge's order on the preliminary injunction, the Administration also lacks any statutory authority allowing it to accept outside funds and direct them to the project:

The President may at any time go to Congress to obtain express authority to construct a ballroom and to do so with private funds. Indeed, Congress may even choose to appropriate funds for the ballroom, or at least decide that some other funding scheme is acceptable.

cdn.savingplaces.org: PDF document

That's in the conclusion, but it's of a piece with the substantive discussion elsewhere in the opinion that Congress has not authorized the President to accept private donations to fund the ballroom, and that such authorization would be necessary for him to be able to do that.

Perhaps that's not all that much of a difference, because I suspect that any bill that could get through Congress containing the former could also include the latter. But I don't think just adding a penny in appropriations alone would do it.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community