Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |
Author: Lapsody 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48456 
Subject: Re: Another Win For President Trump
Date: 03/06/2024 11:00 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
ALSo people talk past each other. Certain progressives label an institutional practice as "racist," and the 'normies' think that they're saying that the institutional practice is motivated by current intentional racial animus. That's not what they're saying, but that's what most people think they're saying. Then the 'normies' push back and say that they don't want their kids being told that certain things are "racist," and the progressives think that they're arguing that no racial inequities exist in those things and are thus denying history. Which, again, is not what the 'normies' are saying - they're just saying that there is no current intentional racial animus in those things

You can't get too abstract about racism - it loses credulity. It's OK if you have an academic exercise, but not to base policy on it. You can point to a statistic and say racism. But you're much better off to do some investigatory work to see why that statistic exists, and if it gets too abstract, or is indeterminable, publish and move on. Loren Cobb could comment on this. I see Goofyhoofy is back in town. :)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds