Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
No. of Recommendations: 4
NYT Buries the Lede: Admits No Proof Trump Was Involved in Epstein Crimes
SNIP
“The New York Times acknowledged in a recent report that there has never been any evidence connecting President Donald Trump to the criminal activities of convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, despite years of public speculation and repeated claims pushed by Democratic officials.”
Snip
“The admission comes after months of renewed efforts by Democratic leaders and allied activists to link President Trump to Epstein’s crimes.
Those efforts intensified on Thursday, when party officials circulated a collection of emails, some newly disclosed and others dating back years, to claim Trump had a close personal relationship with Epstein.
Among the materials promoted by Democrats were emails in which Epstein expressed hostility toward Trump.”
MORE
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/12/nyt-buries-the-l...To quote: “It's got to really suck to be TDS sufferers, especially when you get zero satisfaction, and especially also when you get trapped by your own stupidity.”
LOL@boardliberals
No. of Recommendations: 12
LM. Please do better...
Lifezette is not a credible source of information.
They have a long history of promoting conspiracy theories and failed fact checks.
LifeZette has published debunked stories like the "Clinton Body Count" and false claims about "George Soros-Linked Voting Machines."
It has a track record of false claims, including fabricated quotes from politicians.
MAGA's gullibility is destroying America.
https://theclick.news/opinion-conservative-publica...
No. of Recommendations: 3
...and there was nothing incriminating in the typed transcripts Nixon offered either.
Steve
No. of Recommendations: 6
Lifezette is not a credible source of information.
They have a long history of promoting conspiracy theories and failed fact checks.
Perhaps the biggest potential boon of AI is its ability to act as an "expert" net sifter (to use Steve203's term) and provide a cogent and accurate synopsis of the most important aspects of any issue. Ideally, AIs can winnow out the lies and inaccuracies and leave the consensus truth. But we also have to let the AIs mature a bit and become more sane and less subject to hallucinations.
Of course, this idea ultimately relies on the AIs evolving to be trustworthy and accurate in the long run.
And woe the day we have a "MAGAAI" or a "FOXAI" that is deliberately biased against truth.
No. of Recommendations: 2
And woe the day we have a "MAGAAI" or a "FOXAI" that is deliberately biased against truth.
Surely we will have that...don't you think?
No. of Recommendations: 3
Surely we will have that...don't you think?
I suspect you are right. If there's money to be made - and there will be! - some corrupt MFer <cough>POTUS</cough> will try to capitalize.
No. of Recommendations: 9
NYT Buries the Lede: Admits No Proof Trump Was Involved in Epstein Crimes.
Then, pray tell, why hasn’t Trump released ALL the unredacted (except for victim's identities) Epstein files as he promised to do many times?
Asking for a friend.
No. of Recommendations: 1
Lifezette is not a credible source of information.
Oh yawn....the liberal response to articles they do not agree with.
Easy to find sites not agreeing with any blog.
Tell us, what damning proof has the democrats, etc come up with concerning President Trump
other than he said she said they said, words said taken out of content and speculating.
No. of Recommendations: 1
Surely we will have that...don't you think?
I suspect you are right. If there's money to be made - and there will be! - some corrupt MFer <cough>POTUS</cough> will try to capitalize.
Could be part of 'Truth' Social.
No. of Recommendations: 4
No Proof Trump Was Involved in Epstein Crimes.
Gullible is another word for MAGA.
No. of Recommendations: 2
Lurker Mom,
The people you are debating with (if it could even be called that) in this thread are Leftist feces throwing monkey brains.
Perfect example, one of the lower primates used the phrase "consensus truth" and that A.I. would provide it to us.
What a dum dum.
There is no such thing as "consensus truth." By definition.
And to hope that completely unreliable A.I. (who even monkey brain admits is subject to hallucinations) should do his thinking for him....holy crap what a disgraceful excuse for even a primate.
