Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro


Personal Finance Topics / Macroeconomic Trends and Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Post New
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 3852 
Subject: Dept of War-Risks of alien power mongers
Date: 12/22/25 4:29 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/22/climate/trump-o...
OK - that's hyperbole, but reality mimics the rediculous.

In the latest blow to the US offshore wind industry, the Trump administration announced Monday it is suspending the federal leases for all large offshore wind projects currently under construction, citing unspecified national security risks.

The exact national security risks of concern are unclear. In a news release, the Interior Department cited “national security risks identified by the Department of War in recently completed classified reports,” but didn’t say specifically what those risks were. The release also noted the potential for wind turbine movement and light reflectivity to interfere with radar.

In a Monday Fox Business interview, Interior Sec. Doug Burgum said the Department of Defense has “conclusively” determined that large offshore wind farms “have created radar interference that creates a genuine risk for the US,” especially “our east coast population centers.”

It marks a major escalation in President Donald Trump’s attacks against offshore wind, a form of energy he has long railed against. The suspension could impact billions of dollars of investment and stall nearly six gigawatts of new electricity set to come online in the next few years. (He has claimed they cause cancer and reduce the value of nearby golf courses).

The new sweeping order impacts five projects being built in the Atlantic Ocean, including a massive Virginia offshore wind farm that could eventually be the largest such project in the nation. Set to be completed by the end of 2026, it would supply electricity to Virginia, the state with the world’s largest cluster of power-hungry data centers — and skyrocketing energy costs partially tied to that growing demand. Other wind farms impacted are off the coast of New England.

Last year, Sweden blocked the construction of new wind farms over concerns they could interfere with military radar, amid heightened tensions between the European Union and Russia. But experts have noted the design of wind farms can be adjusted to account for the issue, and it’s something US government officials have been aware of for decades.

In the meantime, copper has increased in price by more than 30% during 2025 and, while EV's are being deemphasized in the US, new data centers are blossoming like asters in the spring. I'm guessing that the recent Trump in nuclear fusion means we will see all sorts of government assistance to head in that direction - possibly asymmetrically supporting his trust fund's new investment.

IMHO. our electrical grid is going to begin to crumble as prices for electricity will soar. While electrical utilities may be government regulated, there are all sorts of opportunities to profit on the infrastructure and mineral side of the equation.

Jeff
Print the post


Author: Steve203 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 3852 
Subject: Re: Dept of War-Risks of alien power mongers
Date: 12/22/25 4:40 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0

In the latest blow to the US offshore wind industry, the Trump administration announced Monday it is suspending the federal leases for all large offshore wind projects currently under construction, citing unspecified national security risks.

It was made clear, in the summer of 24, that the incoming administration would be all in on hydrocarbon fuels.

Steve
Print the post


Author: tjscott0   😊 😞
Number: of 3852 
Subject: Re: Dept of War-Risks of alien power mongers
Date: 12/23/25 9:16 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Coal power electric power plants--I''m BACK!

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/12/these-15-c...

Since the second Trump administration took power in January, at least 15 coal plants have had planned retirements pushed back or delayed indefinitely, a DeSmog analysis found.

That’s mostly due to an expected rise in electricity demand, a surge largely driven by the rise of high-powered data centers needed to train and run artificial intelligence (AI) models.

Nearly 75 percent of the coal plants were on track to shutter in the next two years.

I suppose that temporarily that is no longer the case.

Not long ago, coal really did keep the lights on. In 2005, it provided roughly half of America’s electricity, making it by far the dominant power source nationwide. But in the past two decades, coal’s market share has rapidly waned. No new coal plants have come online since 2013. These days, its footprint has dwindled, with just 16 percent of the overall energy mix.

environmental regulations didn’t kill coal. Instead, its demise became inevitable mostly thanks to the rise of a competing fossil fuel: natural gas.

Gas has both economic and technological advantages over coal, said David Lindequist, an economist at Miami University who co-authored a recent paper on the environmental impacts of the shale gas boom.

As new fracking technologies helped to flood the U.S. market with cheap gas in the mid-2000s, utilities began a broad coal-to-gas pivot that’s still underway today.

the Trump administration said in September that it plans to feed the AI boom — with an estimated 100 gigawatts of capacity in the next five years — by keeping more old coal plants open. “I would say the majority of that coal capacity will stay online,” Wright said.


Gas turbine bottleneck:
May 30th, 2025
https://www.spglobal.com/energy/en/news-research/l...
US gas-fired turbine wait times as much as seven years; costs up sharply
February 20, 2025
https://www.power-eng.com/gas/turbines/long-lead-t...
Long lead times are dooming some proposed gas plant projects

~10 years to build a nuclear power plant.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Typical-timeli...
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends and Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds