No. of Recommendations: 6
i am not one to stand in the way of MAGA-on-MAGA grift.
this was a caution for the fiscally skeptical, capable of examining what was on offer.
This is a good example - Ackman, a lifelong Democrat, finally couldn't take the sheer incompetence and lunacy of his party, and supported the (also somewhat lunatic) Republican alternative. For this sin, anything he does will now be called 'MAGA grift'.
But before dismissing Ackman's proposal based on the 1.5% fees, people should look at his spectacular track record. I guess I'm in the '-on-MAGA' part of the expression, but I've taken a small stake because I think there is a high probability that HHH works out really well, but if it doesn't, I'll add to the schadenfreude for the skeptics on the left. They deserve a little consolation, after taking such a beating.
dtb
