Post #19366 by onepoorguy on the Berkshire Hathaway board

Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

Or maybe his number had more to do with the aid packages buried in there? Hmm.

Probably. There were a lot of Dems willing to hold their noses to get Ukraine aid to further confound Russia.

So in other words, the only reason some democrats were for the bill was to get the Ukraine dollars.

At last, an accurate statement. Yes. Without language about the DREAMERs, which is a big Dem issue, it would have been a hard sell without Ukraine aid.

I think it would have improved some things. "Solved" is a bit strong. But "improved" would be accurate. However, the Border Patrol were behind the bill because it gave them more resources to deal with this problem, more money for asylum courts, etc. Neither side of this debate would have regarded it as a panacea. But a definite improvement over what we current have (which, perhaps, is a low bar to clear).

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Berkshire Hathaway FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.