Post #20414 by Odzar on the Berkshire Hathaway board

Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 6

Maybe they should be called subscalers rather than hyperscalers? The attractions of the firms was traditionally that their unit economics improved with size: not much incremental capital required to support an incremental user. But this now may not only have ceased being true, but even gone into reverse in some cases. Though perhaps only for a while, who knows.

And their past unit economic improvements were largely from growing their individual (quasi-)monopolies. Whereas their massive AI investments are largely to compete with each other in similar markets, apparently.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Berkshire Hathaway FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.