Post New

PUTIN SOUGHT TO HELP TRUMP WIN...

"A binder holding top-secret intelligence that contributed to a U.S. assessment that Russia tried to help throw the 2016 U.S. election to
Donald Trump has been missing since the last days of his presidency, a source familiar with the issue said."

"The Office of the Director of National Intelligence in January 2017 released an assessment that found Russian President Vladimir Putin and
his government conducted a campaign of disinformation and cyberattacks to help Trump’s election chances."

"The disappearance of the binder ignited such deep concerns that the government last year offered to brief the Senate Intelligence Committee, which accepted."

For those suffering from Foxmania I'll spell it out for ya:

Putin helped Trump get elected, Trump stole the documents that showed how.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/binder-with-top-s...

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence in January 2017 released an assessment that found Russian President Vladimir Putin and
his government conducted a campaign of disinformation and cyberattacks to help Trump’s election chances."

-------------------

Yep, the Russkies bought tens of thousands of dollars of advertising on Fakebook meanwhile the Dems and their friends at the FBI and CIA are creating the Steele Dossier and launching the Russiagate hoax.

BHM: ...meanwhile the Dems and their friends at the FBI and CIA are creating the Steele Dossier and launching the Russiagate hoax.

Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.” He found that “a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” He also found that “a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations” against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents.

While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “[a] statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”

Mueller could not get Donald Trump or Jr. to sit for depositions and establish a conspiracy and decided it would take too much time to go through the courts to get their testimony and punted (with pressure from Barr).

And if you believe most of the FBI and CIA are democrats -- or "created" the Steele dossier -- there's a bargain on a bridge in Brooklyn that may interest you.

But, sure, you go ahead and keep defending your Hitler-quoting, top secret documents stealing, insurrection inciting, fake electoral vote peddling, Constitution hating, defaming and defrauding rapist idol, Orange Jesus.


https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-brea...

And if you believe most of the FBI and CIA are democrats -- or "created" the Steele dossier -- there's a bargain on a bridge in Brooklyn that may interest you. - CO

--------------------

The entirely of the civil service skews left, by a lot. I don't blame you for not knowing this, as it probably is never mentioned on MSNBC. Keep in minf below is how they donate, I think it is fair to say they vote for dems percent in even higher percentages.

The Department of Justice had more than $2.3 million in donations with 87.6% going to Democrats.

https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/02/12/political-dona...

Several agencies have employee donations in the 2020 political cycle that total in the millions. The agency with the largest total donations was the State Department with more than $5.2 million. This agency also had the largest percentage of donations to Republicans (46.14%). The Department of Defense was a close second with more than $5.2 million donated during the same political cycle. 65% of donations from these employees went to Democrats.

The Department of Justice had more than $2.3 million in donations with 87.6% going to Democrats.

The agency with the highest percentage going to Democrats was the Federal Communications Commission (also, probably the smallest agency depicted and the one with the smallest amount of total donations). 99.29% of donations from people in this agency went to Democrats.
... more at link

The entirely of the civil service skews left, by a lot. I don't blame you for not knowing this, as it probably is never mentioned on MSNBC.

It's hilarious that he thinks the Steele Dossier is an actual intel document. It wasn't. It was bought and paid for by none other than Herself, Hillary! Clinton.

Doubly hilarious is that he thinks the civil service is full of non-partisans. Part of Obama's gift to the country was him loading up key federal agencies with partisan democrats. Hacks like Clapper and Brennan, for example.

Doubly hilarious is that he thinks the civil service is full of non-partisans. Part of Obama's gift to the country was him loading up key federal agencies with partisan democrats. Hacks like Clapper and Brennan, for example. - Dope

-----------------

Yes, and while we are exposing our board friends to new information, let me add that the society of democrats, liberals, and progressives who dominate every federal agency wield a lot of power.

If they are politically aligned with the leadership they are getting, then they can enthusiastically embrace it and even extend it. OTOH, if they oppose the policies of their leadership, then they can drag their feet, withhold advice, rumor-monger, leak to press, etc.

This is what is referred to as the "Deep State". It is unaccountable to the voters and to some degree disenfranchises the citizens who voted for the leadership whose policies they are resisting.

Hey Mike, How do you sleep at night?...

"Republican governors in 15 states are rejecting a new federally funded program to give food assistance to hungry children during the summer months,
denying benefits to 8 million children across the country."

Joe Biden helps needy children get food, GOP takes it away.

Asking for a friend.

<<BHM: This is what is referred to as the "Deep State". It is unaccountable to the voters and to some degree disenfranchises the citizens who voted for the leadership whose policies they are resisting.>>

True, and very too bad.

Ultimately, the situation will lead to their demise.

Or to the demise of the Republic.

If they go first, the Republic has a chance.

If the country goes first, they, and all else, can kiss our collective hinnies adieu.

(I remember reading that Reagan had to reinsert his "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" in to his speech at the Berlin Wall.

Not once, not twice, but at least THREE TIMES. The well-versed deep state morons at State insisted he not say it.)

I was surprised that he didn't tear the morons down.

Yes, and while we are exposing our board friends to new information, let me add that the society of democrats, liberals, and progressives who dominate every federal agency wield a lot of power.

My favorite all time mainstream media moment was when during some Townhall Jake Tapper or whoever it was had to explain to the idiot CNN audience who Peter Stzok and Lisa Page were because of course CNN didn't ever mention them or their misconduct.

It's not surprising to me that their Chatbots still want to resurrect the RussiaRussiaRussia nonsense. All the while simultaneously ignoring Joe Biden's extensive ties to the CCP and a lot of commie money.

"Doubly hilarious is that he thinks the civil service is full of non-partisans."

He knows better than this, it is just an unimportant fact for him

" All the while simultaneously ignoring Joe Biden's extensive ties to the CCP and a lot of commie money."

Don't forget the pass Slow Joe was given on classified documents he was holding from his Senate and VP days for which he cannot make any argument that he had any right to have in his possession

He knows better than this, it is just an unimportant fact for him

It's a feature instead of a bug. He's got zero problem with the FBI using FISA to violate the shit out of some Republican's civil rights like they did with Carter Page.

Evidence???

Evidence of what?
All those subjects have been covered ad nauseam .

Steele dossier was Russian disinformation: https://archive.is/xqQWL
In her testimony last year, Hill warned that the opposition research commissioned by the Democratic Party against Trump and later used by the FBI to obtain a surveillance warrant against a campaign official named Carter Page would be a “perfect opportunity” for the Kremlin to inject disinformation into American political discourse. On Friday, the Justice Department declassified documents that show the FBI investigated the primary source of the dossier for being a Russian agent.

Back on PA the good folks were happy that the FISA courts were being used to spy on Trump Because He Must Be Guilty of Something.

Did Obama put his people all over the place? Of course he did. How do you think “I’ve got a pen and a phone, and if Congress won’t act I will” works if he doesn’t?

He also loaded the military with his woke nonsense https://www.rubio.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/_c...

There’s a tactic among the left wing posters here that’s aimed at allowing them to ignore things they don’t like by claiming “there’s no evidence”. Go ahead with that if you want to, but we ain’t playing.

Sorry. I should have been more explicit. Evidence that hrc was involved with the dossier.

I'm aware that much of the content had been dismissed, and some remains unverified. The person for whom the dossier is named is a counterintelligence person, I think from MI6.

If not for the accusation against hrc, I wouldn't have responded. But that was new, and I am unable to corroborate it.

We already did.

Barack Obama, on camera. was caught telling the Russian President that USA will have "flexibility" on Missile Defense after the election.

Ronald Reagan - whom you Soviet Liberals didn't like - said quite the opposite back in his day.


Philosophically, you Liberals have more in common with Communism than you do Americanism.

We already did.

And the current guy is deep in the pockets of the Chinese Communist Party.

Remember, when a lib accuses you of something, they're already doing it.

Post New

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.