Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48449 
Subject: Re: Another Win For President Trump
Date: 03/05/2024 1:40 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
No military capability is necessary to satisfy the 2d Amendment, because it's an individual right unconnected to the militia.

Just for context, a simple hunting rifle today would be more advanced than someone in the Revolutionary War could have dreamed. You don't need an AR15...a Remington 30-06 would be suitably impressive to them.

But, it was Scalia who decided that it's an individual right not connected with the militia. And while I concede that is the current law, it needs to be overturned. And I will support any efforts to do so. But it will take a long time because we have a wildly conservative SCOTUS, and it will take time for them to age-out. And then you have to have a case brought before them that can overturn Heller and McDonald. Not going to happen within my lifetime.

Doesn't mean I'm not a federalist. It just means I think the SCOTUS, and especially Scalia, got it wrong this time. If our Union persists long enough, I think Heller and McDonald will be viewed by history right up there with Dredd-Scot as huge errors by the Court.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds