Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 80404 
Subject: Re: You can't ever appease the lefty mob
Date: 06/29/26 2:43 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
So life expectancy has increased by a bit more than 5 years, but the retirement age increase took 2 of those years back.


More than that. The way to read that is the following:
In 1940, if you were a guy, your average life expectancy was ~61 years. If you made it to 65, those people generally lasted until ~77.

In 2001, the average guy can make it ~74 years. If you made it to 65, you can probably live another 15 years (to 80).

So the average life expectancy has gone up by quite a lot...meaning many *more* people are making it to 65 and thus pushing into their 80s. Bear in mind this data is 20 years old.

What happens to a social insurance scheme that relies on an ever-increasing population to continue to provide for the retired? What happens if, say, one generation doesn't have enough kids?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (26) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds