Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 75960 
Subject: Re: Regime defies another court order
Date: 02/07/26 12:13 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
The circuit court then ordered the DOJ to submit a plan to grant due process to the prisoners. DOJ is dressing up their answer in legalese, but their answer is "no".

Which complies with the order. The judge didn't order the government to do any specific thing. He ordered them to come back with what they proposed to do. The answer very well can be "nothing" - that the bell is already rung, the glass is already broken, there's nothing to be done. In which case the judge can issue an injunction ordering them to do one or several specific things that the judge has decided are constitutionally required. And the government is signaling that since, at this point, everything that might plausibly be done now has implications for their foreign policy in Venezuela that all of those options are off the table for the court to order.

You'll notice, however, that the government hasn't been sending any more detainees to CECOT this way. They're complying with the Court's determination that they couldn't do this specific thing - the dispute is about remedial measures for the folks they already did it to.

Now, circle back to Trump seizure of ballots and voting machines. Slow walk the investigations, while preventing the Dems who won in those districts taking their seats in Congress. Every suit filed gets the Trump treatment: hung up in litigation, for years.

Again, that's extremely unlikely. Election challenges don't work on normal court time. They're always heavily expedited. Unlike normal litigation, the courts don't let litigants slow walk election challenges. So that's very unlikely to work.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds