Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: PinotPete 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48441 
Subject: Re: authoritarianism
Date: 11/22/2024 6:13 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Didn't realize the Parliament was active in the 1600s.

Yes, while the modern form of Parliament is, well, modern in the sense that it runs the operations of the Kingdom with basically only a rubber stamp by the ruling monarch, it goes back many hundreds of years. It is identifiable in some form from the 13th c on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_Englan...

Many kings (and the relatively few queens) over the centuries recognized the need to have an official body that could authorize...wait for it...taxes. This is ultimately what Charles 1 was fighting his Parliament over - he wanted more money to do things that Parliament didn't agree with. The king still had the power to "call" a Parliament, which he was reluctant to do since they were making him accountable, yet he couldn't get his shillings without their authorization. Classic catch-22 that caught up with him in the end.

Pete
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds