Post #6218 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

But it would be legit grounds for appeal, yes? In which case I would think the prosecutors would want her to recuse also. I would think they wouldn't want even a chance for an appeal to get granted on some procedural thing.

There are always grounds for appeal. No trial ever goes absolutely perfectly. Prosecutors always have to take that risk.

Trump's argument has enough of a basis not to be frivolous - even enough that it would be expected that counsel would at least try to get a recusal in hopes of drawing a better judge. But I don't think it's anywhere strong enough that prosecutors would concede the point.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.