Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |
Author: g0177325   😊 😞
Number: of 48496 
Subject: Re: Audio of Trump's Conversation
Date: 06/27/2023 4:30 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Read the indictment. There are witnesses.

I read it, but "show" can mean different things: were the contents of the document actually visible to anyone?

The second charge seems worse though:

In August or September 2021, at The Bedminster Club, TRUMP showed a
representative of his political action committee who did not possess a
security clearance a classified map related to a military operation and told
the representative that he should not be showing it to the representative and
that the representative should not get too close.

Due to the "not to get too close" warning, perhaps implying that the map was indeed open for easy viewing. But even here, even if the map were in fact open for all to see, unless the person(s) he showed it to was actually able to discern anything, it would not seem to be so harmful to national security. Or at least that's what I would argue if I was one of Trump's third-rate lawyers.

Regardless, I hope it's irrelevant according to "the rules of classified document disclosure" and what Trump did here is in fact enough to convict him on all counts.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds