Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (62) |
Author: sano 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48491 
Subject: Re: Overpopulation
Date: 07/30/2023 5:24 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Albaby wrote:
"Because we've made such amazing advances in technology compared to, say, a few decades ago we certainly can have a global economy that can support 8 or 9 billion people at a higher standard of living than today (on average) within the resources available on earth and without suffering the consequences you describe in your post.

This article in todays NYT explains why that if/then fails with respect to water. It also applies to energy and a host of natural resources.

Another culprit is common to large regions of the world: a growing population whose water demands continue to rise, both because of sheer numbers and, in many places, higher living standards, increasing individual consumption.

We're going to not choose to do that.

Nah. There's too many competing interests among the human groups to effectively manage an equitable distribution of energy and stuff.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/29/world/middleeas...

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (62) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds