Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (115) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 75971 
Subject: Re: Birthright citizenship
Date: 12/10/25 1:26 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
No, there is a second clause, "and subject to the jurisdiction of," which needs to be defined.

Where two clauses are separated by the word "and" they mean different things. So there must be a meaning to jurisdiction aside from just being born here. The law assumes a second clause is necessary, not simply saying the exact same thing in a different way.

The Ark case clearly dealt with only children born here of non citizens in the country legally.

So the issue of automatic citizenship for children born here of non citizens here illegally still needs to be addressed.

Doesn't mean trump will win. It only takes four votes to get Supreme Court to hear a case. So Alito, Scalia, and two of the three libs would be enough or any other combo.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (115) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds