Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (96) |
Author: mungofitch ✹✺🐝 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 22352 
Subject: Re: Dividends
Date: 12/31/23 2:53 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 20
Something to ponder...

But not for too long : )
Once you've pondered for a little bit, you realize that what you're selling in any given bear market is a very small percentage of what you're going to be selling during your whole retirement.
(or you have a very small portfolio and therefore much bigger worries to ponder)

Over 10 or 20 or 40 years or whatever, the average valuation level you get on stuff you sell is going to be pretty average. Sometimes lucky, sometimes not, all comes out in the wash.


The "cost" of holding say 2-3 years of cash as a safety net is "not nothing".

I agree that cash cushions for bear markets are problematic. You need to be able to forecast prices 3 years in advance to figure out when to use it and when to sell more stuff to replenish it. I wouldn't want to try that when I'm old and [even more] doddering. Other than a cash pile for emergencies, I don't see a great need for a cash cushion to ride through bear markets, for the reasoning above: it's a passing problem and you'll sell at average prices over time anyway, so don't sweat it.

My key assertion is that a good portfolio with a low dividend yield is very much better to have than a worse portfolio selected for a high dividend yield. So start with the best picks you can manage. If you can put together a decent port with a high dividend yield, that's great, but beware the "reach" risk--on average you get much lower total returns as the payout gets high. The best way to build a dividend portfolio is usually to pick a bunch of plausibly good stocks which happen to have not-too-high yields.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,861 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 58 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 55 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (96) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community