Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 86278 
Subject: Re: Iran - The Difference in Assessment
Date: 03/13/26 10:14 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
It comes down to whether you believe the administrations endless fount of lies or you believe in facts.

It also matters what you think those facts mean.

There's no reason to doubt that the U.S. has all-but-destroyed Iran's ability to exercise "conventional" military power. We had overwhelming conventional military superiority over them. Going into the war, there was little chance they could avoid having their air force, navy, and fixed missile installations and other military bases utterly destroyed by our air power. Those things are also relatively simple for militaries and intelligence services from other countries to monitor and assess. The Administration is almost certainly telling the truth about the amount of damage we've done to Iran's conventional military capabilities.

The issue is what that means. Iran is able to keep the Strait shut down because they also have the ability to wage asymmetric war. Overwhelming conventional military superiority doesn't mean that you eliminate the ability of your opponent to fight back - it just means they can't fight you on the conventional battlefield. As we learned to our dismay in Iraq. So even though Iran's conventional military has been all-but-eliminated, they can still use small-bore tactics (drones, mines, small portable non-ballistic missiles, etc.) to inflict damage. Because the Strait of Hormuz is so narrow, those tactics are effective in inflicting massive global economic problems. You can't bomb your way out of that problem.

So as long as the regime exists and has internal control over the country, they'll have the ability to keep their hands around the neck of the global economy. As long as the regime exists and has internal control over the country, they'll be well positioned to resume to their prior threat level a relatively short time after the conflict ends. Again, it took them barely eight months to go from their nuclear program having been "obliterated" to again posing an unfathomable threat to the world - the damage is much more widespread this time around, but with $2 trillion GDP (PPP), they'll have plenty of resources to rebuild over time.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 86,214 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (75) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community