No. of Recommendations: 20
Pedo Don had repeatedly said we won the war with Iran but this morning threatened to "conclude our lovely 'stay' in Iran by blowing up and completely obliterating" all of iran's "Electric Generating Plants, Oil Wells and Kharg Island (and possibly all desalinization [sic] plants!".
When a reporter asked about Pedo Don threatening war crimes, Leavitt suggested that NBC's Garrett Haake was only asking about war crimes because he was been put up to it by "experts", a word she uses with disdain: "Because I’m sure some experts are telling you that in your ear, to try to ask me that question.”
NBC: Under international law, hitting civilian infrastructure is prohibited. Why is POTUS threatening war crimes?
LEAVITT: POTUS has made it quite clear to the Iranian regime their best move is to make a deal or else.
NBC: Which objectives would destroying a desalination plant help?
LEAVITT: Haley, go ahead.
Gee, you know the guy's in deep sh1t when he commits war crimes to divert attention away from his raping a 13-year-old girl.
BTW, there's some news that her accusation has been corroborated.
No. of Recommendations: 5
...and Kharg Island (and possibly all desalinization [sic] plants!".
PedoTUS seems to have -ization on the brain lately. He mentioned "transgender mutilization" at the recent Air Force presser.
No. of Recommendations: 3
Under international law, hitting civilian infrastructure is prohibited.
Quibble. The oil depots are arguably strategic targets. Just like Ploesti in WWII. Power plants would -I think- qualify as civilian infrastructure. Though I would note that during Iraq I we saw several images of bridges being bombed, which arguably also were strategic as they would enable ground forces to move more freely.
I think if we aren't willing to destroy Kharg Island because it will affect oil prices, then we definitely shouldn't be there. If we're in a war, then whether an action affects our economy is irrelevant. We're trying to win, and crippling them economically is part of winning the war. But we aren't willing. It's just an action without an end-game plan, or what "winning" would even be. Sinking their navy, and crippling their air force is only a part of it. It's not enough to "win", to affect any real change.
This is just another excursion with no clear plan to "win", like Vietnam, Iraq (twice), Afghanistan...
Militarily we pretty much have won. But we're still going to lose because nothing will change, because they have no end-game plan. Heck, the regime is posting taunting Lego videos claiming his is the Felon's attempt to distract from the Epstein Files (just saw one today).
