Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of LHX | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search LHX
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of LHX | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤
Search LHX


Stocks A to Z / Stocks L / L3Harris Technologies (LHX)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |
Post New
Author: Labadal   😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Free at Last
Date: 07/29/2025 12:40 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Yesterday, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) released a memo stating, among other things, that federal employees “may engage in conversations regarding religious topics with fellow employees, including attempting to persuade others of the correctness of their own religious views, provided that such efforts are not harassing in nature.”

So if I go back to work at the federal job I retired from 3 months ago, I am free to convert all to atheism. 😆

Trump administration to allow federal workers to talk religion at work - The Washington Post https://share.google/Nnpa0hsPger86IdAD
Print the post


Author: PinotPete   😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Re: Free at Last
Date: 07/30/2025 8:40 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
...may engage in conversations regarding religious topics with fellow employees, including attempting to persuade others of the correctness of their own religious views, provided that such efforts are not harassing in nature...

First, would atheism be considered a "religious view" for purposes of this memo? Isn't atheism the lack of a religious view?

Second, who gets to interpret whether an "effort" to persuade is harassing or not?

Seems rife for an unbalanced employment environment when it comes to which religious views are allowed and which are not.

Pete
Print the post


Author: Labadal   😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Re: Free at Last
Date: 07/30/2025 9:56 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Good questions!

It's rife alright! A few examples jump to mind:

If I were in a Veterans Affairs hospital, I might have to watch the surgeon pray over my body before surgery, in a religion I don't believe in. And if I asked him to please stop praying, could I expect him to do his best after he opened me up?

Or, think of how easy it would be to claim that any personnel decision is retaliatory, if everyone is trying to convert you and you don’t go along.

Or, how loud will all the Christians bitch and moan when Muslims and others try to convert them?

But if I go back to work, I could create DOSE, the Department of Satan Enthusiasts, and infiltrate the entire "sanctimonious federal bureaucracy." So there's that.

Regarding your first question, atheism is definitely a religious topic. I might also say that my religious view is that there is no god. But we could quibble over definitions.
Print the post


Author: PinotPete   😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Re: Free at Last
Date: 07/30/2025 11:26 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Regarding your first question, atheism is definitely a religious topic. I might also say that my religious view is that there is no god. But we could quibble over definitions.

I agree that "religion" as a word or concept has multiple meanings and that one could broadly say that it includes atheism under one definition, although my emphasis is on the memo's language and how it is interpreted. We can argue that atheism is meant as a religion so far as "religious view" is described there, but what the people who promulgated the memo think (and agree to) is likely how that definition would be interpreted. If the definition and the acts permitted go the way they don't like, do we expect them to interpret it in our favor or theirs?

Pete
Print the post


Author: Labadal   😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Re: Free at Last
Date: 07/30/2025 11:45 AM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
If the definition and the acts permitted go the way they don't like, do we expect them to interpret it in our favor or theirs?

Haha, great question! With this administration, it virtually answers itself! 😉
Print the post


Author: ges 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Re: Free at Last
Date: 07/30/2025 5:23 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
You don't have to be a genius to understand who is behind this and why. The Christian far right. Even examples given in the guidance are biased towards Christians and Jews.

But I like your idea of going all in on enlightening people about atheism. Of course in many organizations that might cost you your job.

It's funny that Trump, who clearly only uses religion to manipulate people (it's obvious he has no religious beliefs), is all in on this sort of nonsense because it endears him to a large portion of his base. And the christo-fascists who want to turn our country into a theocracy are thrilled.

Print the post


Author: onepoorguy   😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Re: Free at Last
Date: 07/30/2025 5:50 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Looking forward to the first complaints about people touting Baphamet. (Hopefully the Satanists are already hatching a scheme...)
Print the post


Author: unquarked   😊 😞
Number: of  
Subject: Re: Free at Last
Date: 07/30/2025 8:16 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
I might also say that my religious view is that there is no god. But we could quibble over definitions.

My view is that god is a placeholder for ignorance, or a lack of understanding.

Tom
Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |


Announcements
L3Harris Technologies FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of LHX | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds