No. of Recommendations: 3
BHM: enough evidence? All the CNN article did was speculate in a different direction concerning what a few checks "truly" represented.
Hardly.
<snip>But banking records reviewed by CNN, which Comer’s committee possesses, provide substantial evidence in support of the Democrats’ assertions that there was indeed a $200,000 loan from Joe Biden to James Biden less than two months before the James Biden "loan repayment" check to Joe Biden for the same amount.<snip>
It isn't hard to read bank records, I've done it. So there is SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, not speculation done lightly - first. Second, there isn't anything that contradicts what ix written on the checks. All that is written by Comer - that there is a pattern that shows Biden knew, participated, and benefited hasn't been supported one bit. Not at all.
This is only a few checks:
May 26 From: Joe Biden To: Hunter Biden $200,000 Note: Loan
Aug 6 From: Hunter Biden To: Joe Biden $200,000 Note: Loan Repayment