Post #26540 by Lambo on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (40)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

Some big time point conflation going on here by your opponent.

Tossing a suit for Lack Of Standing says nothing about the merits of the facts presented. It’s a form of a technicality that says, you don’t have any say here because this don’t concern you.

No, you misunderstood my comment. The attorneys were so bad, that they screwed up standing in all those cases. And they thought the evidence evidence was good enough in those cases they lost where there was judicial review, which is a comment on the evidence not reviewed for lack of standing. You should be able to understand that.

And it's not concern, it means you can't show you were harmed, and there are notable exceptions.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (40)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.