Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A

Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) ❤
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: Indefensible ⎊  😊 😞
Number: of 15062 
Subject: Re: Capital allocation at Berkshire
Date: 10/25/2023 3:52 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
"Jim, a similar thought popped into my mind recently - could there be an advantage investing in stocks of larger companies that, for whatever reason, have no/little analyst coverage.

The thought being, those less under the microscope and less widely tracked/studied may be largely ignored and could represent some hidden gems.

It's been many years, but I feel like I vaguely recall either ValueLine or SIPRO fields that track number of analysts covering.

Has anyone done backtesting on stocks having zero analyst coverage as the universe?"

I get the free emails from Eddy Elfenbein of CWS (Crossing Wall Street) who often mentions the performances of successful companies with little to no analyst following in the states.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds