Post New

“Renee Nicole Good was Minneapolis ‘ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting”
SNIP
“MINNEAPOLIS — Renee Nicole Good, the mom who was killed by a federal agent after veering her car toward him, was an anti-ICE “warrior” and was part of a group of activists who worked to “document and resist” the federal immigration crackdown in Minnesota, The Post can reveal.

Good, who moved to the city last year, linked up with the anti-ICE activists through her 6-year-old son’s woke charter school, which boasts that it puts “social justice first” and prioritizes “involving kids in political and social activism,” multiple local sources said.

“She was a warrior. She died doing what was right,” a mother named Leesa, whose child attends the same school, told The Post at a growing vigil where Good was killed Wednesday.

Good and her wife Rebecca, 40, were raising the boy together in the mostly working-class, activist-heavy neighborhood of south Minneapolis, which features tree-lined streets and a large number of homes with windows decked out in LGBTQ+ flags or signs depicting George Floyd.”

SNIP
“ICE Watch recently shared an Instagram post of the group’s which encouraged agitators to bring items that would help them barricade the streets around where the shooting took place, even urging people to bring things to burn, such as dried-up Christmas trees.

This call for aggressive and even violent resistance comes as ICE agents have faced an unprecedented spike in car attacks, surging by some 3,200% over the last year, shocking data released by the Department of Homeland Security revealed to The Post.”

https://nypost.com/2026/01/08/us-news/renee-nicole...

Yep, she was a political activist who trained and planned for moments such as this.
She wasn’t just a mother, a wife, and wrote poetry for a living. She was a hard-core activist with ties to extremists who stalked ICE agents.

The left here is supporting a nutcase lunatic.

LurkerMom: This call for aggressive and even violent resistance comes as ICE agents have faced an unprecedented spike in car attacks, surging by some 3,200% over the last year...

3,200%!!! Oh my God!!!

Aside from the fact that the percentage is self-reported by the Department of Homeland Security and not independently verified, in numbers, again self-reported by the Department of Homeland Security, that is an increase in vehicular attacks over the past year from 2 attacks to 66 attacks in the prior period.

For additional perspective, there are over 20,000 ICE employees.

66 attacks of a population of 20,000 ICE employees is .003%.

But 3,200% sounds better, I guess.


LurkerMom: Yep, she was a political activist who trained and planned for moments such as this. She wasn’t just a mother, a wife, and wrote poetry for a living. She was a hard-core activist with ties to extremists who stalked ICE agents.

So, then, you're saying it was okay to kill her by shooting her in the face.

She had it coming.

Umm.

So? Activism isn't a crime.

“Renee Nicole Good was Minneapolis ‘ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting”.

That's fine by me, but I'm interested in the training. Anything on that?

“ICE Watch recently shared an Instagram post of the group’s which encouraged agitators to bring items that would help them barricade the streets around where the shooting took place, even urging people to bring things to burn, such as dried-up Christmas trees.

This call for aggressive and even violent resistance

Don't see anything violent, like guns or Molotov cocktails. Xmas tree burnings are fun :)

Yep, she was a political activist who trained and planned for moments such as this.
She wasn’t just a mother, a wife, and wrote poetry for a living. She was a hard-core activist with ties to extremists who stalked ICE agents.

The left here is supporting a nutcase lunatic.

Even from what the article wrote I wouldn't consider her a nutcase lunatic. I didn't read about any extremists who stalked ICE Agents in the article. Where'd you get that? She sounds like a normal activist who encountered a rogue ICE agent who should be taken off duty permanently.

So, then, you're saying it was okay to kill her by shooting her in the face.

She had it coming.

Umm.

Nope, not at all. I’m saying she was a trained activist using her vehicle as a weapon.
You can’t deny she just stumble upon this scene unaware.

One agent almost got his hand ripped off when he attempted to open her car door but she
sped off aiming to mow down another agent.

Again, she was a hard core activist who stalked ICE agents looking to cause mayhem.

But ya, if you want to support her and blame the agent defending himself,
shrug, ask me if I care. I’m use to your side siding with illegals and lawbrakers.

Umm.

She was a hard-core activist with ties to extremists who stalked ICE agents.


Oh, you mean an American patriot standing for truth, justice and the American way. Gawdawful, eh.

LM, you are sick.

Yup, Ms. Good was nuttier than squirrel poop.

Oh, you mean an American patriot standing for truth, justice and the American way. Gawdawful, eh.

LM, you are sick.

American patriots do not fight causing mayhem to your local Police Officers in the act of
arresting law breakers.
American patriots also do not fight causing mayhem when Federal Agents of the U.S. government (ICE)
are attempting to make arrests of law breaking illegal aliens.

No, I’m quite well, thank you.
LM, American patriot.🇺🇸

LurkerMom: Nope, not at all. I’m saying she was a trained activist using her vehicle as a weapon.

Umm.

Her ex-husband, who asked not to be named out of concern for the safety of their children, told the Associated Press that Good had just dropped off her youngest son at school on Wednesday and was driving home with her partner when they encountered a group of ICE agents on a snowy street.

He said she was not an activist, and had not taken part in any kind of protest that he was aware of. He said she was a devoted Christian who took part in youth mission trips to Northern Ireland when she was younger.

She certainly seemed to live the core Christian commandment: "Love thy neighbor as thyself."

She had a glove compartment filled with stuffed animals for her six-year-old child, standard equipment of trained terrorists.

But seriously, what kind of ghoul slanders a woman who was shot in the face on a suburban American street by Pedo Don's private army?

You guys sound gleeful.

All of you should go read Exodus 20:16. And Deuteronomy 19:18.

And stop following the teachings of Pedo Don Satan.

But seriously, what kind of ghoul slanders a woman who was shot in the face on a suburban American street by Pedo Don's private army?

I believe you answered your own question.

LurkerMom: Nope, not at all. I’m saying she was a trained activist using her vehicle as a weapon.


I know you get your information from the liars and propagandists on the right wing networks and social media, but...

this is utter bullshit!

Still absolutely no explanation for why she deliberately tried to flee from law enforcement and failed to heed their instructions to stop and exit her vehicle.

The fact that her partner was in the car with her, prior to the shooting, yet was not in the car when the shooting occurred, seems to suggest that the partner complied with ICE directives to exit the vehicle.

But seriously, what kind of ghoul slanders a woman who was shot in the face on a suburban American street by Pedo Don's private army?

Someone who professes to be religious yet thinks it’s ok to bear false witness against thy neighbor.

But seriously, what kind of ghoul slanders a woman who was shot in the face on a suburban American street by Pedo Don's private army?

You guys sound gleeful.

Stop the BS. She was committing a criminal act impeding Federal Agents from doing their job.

All of you should go read Exodus 20:16. And Deuteronomy 19:18.

And stop following the teachings of Pedo Don Satan.

LOL LOL LOL a Heathen quoting the Bible? Give me a break. 🤣

Stop the BS. She was committing a criminal act impeding Federal Agents from doing their job.


Exactly. We're interested in the truth of the event. Real ghouls celebrate death, as thousands of libs did when Kirk was murdered and Trump was shot.

They're interested in making political statements and trying to bully others.

Who's the real monster here?

Russia has long been a country where dissidents are arrested or summarily shot. Now America has joined that Hall of Shame.

LurkerMom: She was committing a criminal act impeding Federal Agents from doing their job.

Huh. When someone commits a criminal act, they should be arrested, not shot in the face. You would have made a good little Nazi.

LurkerMom: LOL LOL LOL a Heathen quoting the Bible? Give me a break.

You know even less about me than you know about scripture.

Huh. When someone commits a criminal act, they should be arrested, not shot in the face. You would have made a good little Nazi.

Oh! more laughing out loud....bringing out the Nazi bomb.🙄

She might have been arrested had she not sped off. An Officer was attempting to open
her car door as seen in the videos, but no, she put her car in reverse then slammed full
speed ahead aiming for another agent.

You know even less about me than you know about scripture.

Could be, but I know enough from your posts you need professional help for your seething TDS.

When someone commits a criminal act, they should be arrested, not shot in the face. - CO

--------------

Step One of the arrest is order the accused criminal out of the car. Step 2 they comply.

Step One of the arrest is order the accused criminal out of the car. Step 2 they comply.

Is there any indication that she was doing anything illegal or criminal at the time she was told to leave the car?

Is there any indication that she was doing anything illegal or criminal at the time she was told to leave the car?

Besides blocking the road and interfering with ICE officers, then a) failing to leave the car and b) attempting to flee the scene?

She committed 3 crimes before she hit Ross with the car.

Besides blocking the road and interfering with ICE officers, then a) failing to leave the car and b) attempting to flee the scene

Did she forcibly interfere with ICE officers? I've only seen videos that start with the car in the road. Blocking a road for a short period of time is probably not a crime. Failing to leave the car is probably not a crime, either (most states have a "failure to comply with a lawful order statute, but Minnesota's is rather narrowly drafted and wouldn't cover this situation).

That would leave forcible interference with a federal officer under 18 USC 111, which applies to a person who:

(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties; or

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/111

She'd almost certainly have had to do something more than have her car in the road for that to apply. Did she?

Step 3: Don't try to run the arresting officer over with your SUV.

Doesn't matter if she wasn't doing anything illegal when she was asked to stop her vehicle and get out of the car.

Just like it doesn't matter if you're pulled over by a cop for a traffic infraction and asked to exit your vehicle, but it later turns out the cop made a mistake so the traffic violation is thrown out by the court.

Motorists have to obey the directions of the law enforcement officer. Period.

If you want to challenge the legality of the stop, or the detention, or both, that's something you do later on in court.

You don't run the cop over with your SUV.

Did she forcibly interfere with ICE officers? I've only seen videos that start with the car in the road. Blocking a road for a short period of time is probably not a crime. Failing to leave the car is probably not a crime, either (most states have a "failure to comply with a lawful order statute, but Minnesota's is rather narrowly drafted and wouldn't cover this situation).

She'd been following ICE officers IIRC.
Either way, what you're arguing is exactly what her defense counsel would *at her arraignment*...after they would have arrested her.

That would leave forcible interference with a federal officer under 18 USC 111

Assuming they charged her with that. Vehicular assault is the more likely charge, and she definitely did that.

At any rate. She
-blocked the road
-refused instructions to exit the vehicle
-attempted to flee the scene
-assaulted an officer

That's quite the list for only about 10 seconds.

Albaby1,

OK stop playing "pretend internet lawyer."

You're obviously not a real lawyer although at times it seems like you're trying to get people to believe you might be one.

Once again: Motorists are obligated to obey the presumptively valid instructions of law enforcement officers.

Not run the officer over with their SUV.

You challenge the legality of the police officer's actions when you get in front of the judge.

You don't run the cop over.

Why do you dum dums seem to misunderstand this?

It's basic ignorance of the law and lack of common sense.

Dope1: Besides blocking the road and interfering with ICE officers, then a) failing to leave the car and b) attempting to flee the scene?

Not a crime, not a crime, not a crime, and some of the ICE officers instructed her to move her car.

Dope1: She committed 3 crimes before she hit Ross with the car.

Zero crimes, and she did not "hit Ross with the car." That's been clearly established by several independent news organizations.

Over the last year, public opinion has shifted meaningfully against Pedo Don’s immigration and deportation policies, and against ICE. 42% of U.S. adults now support abolishing ICE entirely. That compares to 21% on Election Day 2024.

As ICE officials become more violent, more deadly, and more unhinged, that percentage will rise.

We're at a turning point.

Well technically she did not commit a crime since she's dead and you can't convict a dead person of a crime.

But she certainly drove in a reckless fashion (crime) and she certainly committed vehicular assault (even if her SUV did not actually contact the officer).

People go to jail every day for doing what she did.

Dope1: She'd been following ICE officers IIRC.

As usual, you don't recall correctly. Multiple news outlets reporting on the incident describe her as a local resident who encountered ICE agents in her neighborhood, not someone actively pursuing them.

Dope1: That's quite the list for only about 10 seconds.

The road wasn't blocked. She moved her vehicle and let cars through. She was waiting for cars to go past her before driving off, as instructed.

She never assaulted anyone.

You're completely misinformed.

-blocked the road
-refused instructions to exit the vehicle
-attempted to flee the scene
-assaulted an officer

That's quite the list for only about 10 seconds.

I mean, not necessarily. Unless she had previously committed a crime, as far as I can tell she was under no obligation to follow the instructions to exit the vehicle (not legal advice! and definitely not advice on how to be safe!). Unless she was placed under arrest or otherwise detained, she was perfectly free to leave the scene.

Assault requires intent, and it would be quite surprising if she actually intended to hit the officer rather than just trying to leave.

Again, all of the above is completely speculative - we won't know more until there's actually an investigation and review. Based on what we know. It's also rather beside the point. LEO's aren't allowed to use deadly force to stop a suspect from leaving the scene, much less for failing to follow instructions. I think the officer's real risk would be if he wasn't at risk of being hit with the car when he fired the fatal shot, and that's going to be a ballistics and forensics question based on a lot of information (including all the videos). If he was in the path of the car at the time, he's probably would not have any culpability. If he used deadly force after he was out of the path of the car, he's in more jeopardy. I don't think we know that critical fact yet - but it should be pretty determinable by experts from the ballistics and the video evidence.

LEO's aren't allowed to use deadly force to stop a suspect from leaving the scene, much less for failing to follow instructions.

LEO's can use deadly force if they believe their lives are in danger -or- if a felony is being performed on them. Hitting someone with a car certainly qualifies.

This shooting will be investigated and there's maybe a 1% chance anything gets filed no matter how hard Ellison tries to warp it Minnesota's deadly force statutes are pretty clear.

Step One of the arrest is order the accused criminal out of the car. Step 2 they comply.

Step 3: assassinate her for disobeying a questionable order and yell "fucking bitch!" as she dies.

That's the way it's done!

And MAGA cheers the administration's lawlessness.

You're [Dope] completely misinformed.

I understand where Dope is coming from because I listened to an endless montage of RW media all raging about this woman as a radical left terrorist who deliberately ran over and ICE officer.

See, if Dope and his ilk get their 'news' from pure propaganda sources they will indeed be misinformed. And they clearly are.

It doesn't matter, AT ALL, if Ms. Good "deliberately ran over" the LEO or not,or tried to, because she's not on trial for a crime. You can't try a dead person for a crime, and in order to mount a credible defense if HE is criminally charged, the LEO doesn't have to prove Ms. Good's intentions "beyond a reasonable doubt"--as a prosecutor would have to do if Ms. Good had survived the shooting and was being criminally charged with vehicular assault and/or battery.

The issue is whether or not it was reasonable for the officer to have concluded in an emergency situation with very little time to choose a course of action, under all the facts and circumstances, that Ms. Good and her vehicle posed a threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or another person.

Ms. Good was clearly at a minimum--at least if all reasonable inferences are drawn most favorably to the "defendant" Ross, and the standard of convicting him of a crime is proof beyond a reasonable doubt--driving in a reckless manner or at least in a negligent manner.

Anyone who has ever taken driver's ed knows if a law enforcement officer is standing either immediately in front of your vehicle or close enough to potentially be endangered depending upon what you do as the driver of the vehicle, and the officer orders you to stop and exit the vehicle, you have a duty to stop and exit the vehicle. And you certainly assume the risk that if you continue driving, the officer is injured either by being directly impacted by your vehicle or by having to jump out of the way of it (assuming he's a mind reader and knows which way to jump in the first place).

We don't even know if this woman had a valid license, do we.

She'd almost certainly have had to do something more than have her car in the road for that to apply. Did she?

That's why I say I never saw a reason for him to draw the weapon. You have to have a reason to draw that weapon, I never saw one. If the fellow walking over to the car didn't have a reason to draw his weapon, what was the shooter's reason? If he felt in danger, why was he stopping partly in front of the car? Given a choice If I feel in danger I would stop at the side of the car. So I come to the conclusion he never felt in danger by his own actions, and he didn't draw the weapon because he felt in danger. She presented no threat. She acted more like Aunt Bee from Mayberry than a trained terrorist. Looking at his actions I would take him out of dealing with people as a peace officer forever. Regardless of he outcome, he hasn't got the temperament to deal with people.

Qualified immunity will likely get him off though. It's a shame he drew his gun.

I was puzzled when in the original video we heard a bystander yell "no" for no apparent reason. In the condemning video Vance released, we see that is the moment the agent transferred his cell phone from his right hand to the left, and drew his gun. At this point, the car was stationary.
Alan
wondering if this should be prosecuted as a hate crime, but suspect as you mention "qualified immunity" gets him off.

Alan says at the moment the LEO drew his gun "At this point the car was stationary."

EXACTLY.

And it should have STAYED STATIONARY.

Assault requires intent, and it would be quite surprising if she actually intended to hit the officer rather than just trying to leave.

IMHO, if she had intended to hit the officer, she likely would have succeeded in hitting him. They were close enough that I don’t think he could have got out of the way in time.

—Peter

Besides blocking the road and interfering with ICE officers, then a) failing to leave the car and b) attempting to flee the scene?

She committed 3 crimes before she hit Ross with the car.

Which of the 3 “crimes” justifies killing her?

Step 3: Don't try to run the arresting officer over with your SUV.

The killer didn’t even have to move in order to fire 2 shots through the side window as she drove by the killer.

But other than that, you got nothing right.

Motorists have to obey the directions of the law enforcement officer. Period.

And if they don’t they can be executed on the spot, correct?

She'd been following ICE officers IIRC.

At any rate. She
-blocked the road

If she was following them, how could she block them?

MUS.

Which of the 3 “crimes” justifies killing her?

When she aimed her SUB at the Federal Agent to mow him down.

When she aimed her SUB at the Federal Agent to mow him down.

Have you seen the body cam video from the person who killed her?

She doesn’t appear to be someone who would run over a squirrel, let alone a person.

And, of course, the video shows the killer firing bullets into the side window as she drove by.

She drove right by him. If only the killers aim was as bad as hers.

Step One of the arrest is order the accused criminal out of the car. Step 2 they comply.

Knowing the Federal agents are poorly trained and are known to unnecessarily beat the shit out of their detainees, it's reasonable to attempt to flee.

There's no debating the direction the victim turned her steering wheel. Her executioners camera confirmed that the vehicle was moving away from him, following the front wheels. It's how cars work.

If you are suggesting step 3 is execution, then the USA has completed the conversion to a fascist Reich, where all subordinates to the authoritarian ruler kowtow to said ruler... truth be damned.

And if they don’t they can be executed on the spot, correct?

Apparently that is the logic of these MAGA morons.

Sano like Steve,

Is yet another progressive who either doesn't drive at all; drives minimally and infrequently; and generally is a terrible driver with no real world knowledge of the laws of physics or how vehicles behave.

If a vehicle's front wheels are canted to the left; the driver accelerates forward, and while accelerating forward, the driver cranks the steering wheel to the right, then the way the vehicle actually moves is in a rotational fashion around the axis of the vehicle's turning radius.

The front right side of the vehicle will begin to turn away from a person standing in front of the vehicle. The front left/side of the vehicle will turn INTO a person standing in front of the vehicle.

Depending on exactly where the person is standing, how the driver is driving, handling characteristics of the vehicle, traction of the tires, road surface conditions, and other relevant variables, the left SIDE of the vehicle and the left rear of the vehicle may also be capable of hitting the pedestrian or coming dangerously close.

You know it all know nothing leftie loonies are so out of touch with the real world that you've never played with hot wheels or matchboxes or any kind of toy cars, have you.

You really truly have no idea of how things happen in the real world.

Dum dums.

wondering if this should be prosecuted as a hate crime, but suspect as you mention "qualified immunity" gets him off.

Unless they find a treasure trove of hate stuff on the internet, I'd just see if a case could be built for normal crimes or malfeasance. He violated his training protocols, there was no reason to draw the weapon, no reason to flop partly in front of the SUV,etc. All of the actions could be normal bad judgement. Can they prove a crime happened? The state needs evidence and they're locked out, so getting to beyond a reasonable doubt is more difficult and federal qualified immunity stops the civil suits.

Post New

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.