Post #13663 by g0177325 on the US Policy board

When reading posts, there are yellow stars against the names of the most respected Shrewds. The number of points in the star, starting at 3, represents the Shrewd'm-Star rating. This number is the average recommendation that the author received over the last 12 months.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

If the candidate is 35 years old, then his age does not disqualify hie.

I think you likely meant 34 in your example in which case the state of Colorado should sue the candidate in Federal court to obtain relief and not attempt to make a unilateral decision no matter how obvious the disqualification appears to be. I think this is the essence of the still to be formally issued decision by SCOTUS.

Yes, I meant 34, thanks. And ok.

Being a convicted felon is not among the criteria listed in the constitution

Yes, but even if the crime is insurrection?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.