Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search MI
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search MI


Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Post New
Author: rayvt   😊 😞
Number: of 5386 
Subject: Some data in various hold times on a Jim screen.
Date: 01/19/26 12:08 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
Some data in various hold times on a Jim screen.
"Member of Nasdaq 100
price / (52 week high + 52 week low) top 10"

GTR1 gives the average CAGR for all the variations of start date, but to me that is optimistic rather than realistic. Average is great, but the worst is more important because that's where the risk is. It's better for surprises to be happy rather than bad.

I would like to see the lowest 1/5th (20%) of the returns by start date. From a risk standpoint that's where I would like to count on.

So here are some CAGR stats and the lowest 5 returns for hold periods of 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 1 year.
(20th percentile means 20% are below this and 80% are above this. Median is 50th percentile.)

# days    5         10        21        42        252
Avg 21.74 21.88 21.84 21.23 15.81
Median 21.47 22.02 22.07 21.09 15.73
Avg 5 low 21.74 21.19 20.31 18.57 12.00

20th percentile:
20.26 21.45 20.79 19.53 14.30

Lowest 5:
19.72 19.46 19.66 18.00 11.48
20.39 21.30 19.94 18.67 12.10
21.47 21.48 20.49 18.70 12.11
23.06 21.68 20.66 18.74 12.13
24.07 22.02 20.79 18.75 12.16

One year (252 days) hold for gains to be long term. This is clearly suboptimal for this screen.
Hold from 1 week to 2 months have roughly similar return.
Print the post


Author: musselmant   😊 😞
Number: of 5386 
Subject: Re: Some data in various hold times on a Jim screen.
Date: 01/19/26 1:09 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
I may be coding incorrectly but don't get that result; please post the gtr link.
Print the post


Author: rayvt   😊 😞
Number: of 5386 
Subject: Re: Some data in various hold times on a Jim screen.
Date: 01/19/26 2:07 PM
Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
https://gtr1.net/2013/?s20030103h21r0i10::nas100.a...

10HTD15 is slightly lower but with half the turnover.

That's a 2003 start date. Nasdaq had a huge pop 10/1999 - 3/2000 and then a subsequent crash, so I generally avoid that in backtests. Anyway 2003-now is 23 years, which seems good enough.

The full date range from 19850201 to 20251128 is even better: 26.76% avg.

I check "Rebalance to equal weight among new positions only", because that's how I trade. And probably most people.

Print the post


Post New
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds