Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search MI


Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (46) |
Author: ptheland   😊 😞
Number: of 3962 
Subject: Re: On July 1 We Lost the Republic
Date: 07/03/2024 8:33 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
I think you're confusing the question of whether something is admissible with whether it is discoverable. Just because the conversation might be an official act which is immune from prosecution doesn't mean that investigators can't talk to the people involved.

That's the information I needed. Thank you.

Let me see if I understand, using your next paragraph.

If the President is speaking with his counsel, they can tell prosecutors to pound sand if they ask for the notes - because that information is privileged from discovery and investigation.

Right. Client-attorney privilege.

But the fact that the conversation might be immune wouldn't allow them to shield the notes.

So if Trump and Pence were talking, investigators could subpoena the notes and force their production. Upon examining the notes, the investigators might find evidence of a conspiracy, but because it's just talk about a potential crime and nothing more those notes would not be admissible. The most the investigators could do is use that information to look for other evidence that IS admissible. Is that right?

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (46) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds