No. of Recommendations: 7
"I use a bolt action 30.06, I see no need for any hunter to need to spew lead at a
high rate. 1 shot at a time, make an unrushed, accurate shot, or don't shoot at all.
And you would be a FUD, as in Elmer Fud to them. Nefster:
"In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court noted that "M-16 rifles and the like" are "most useful in military service," suggesting they might not fall under the Second Amendment's protection for common arms, but this was dicta (non-binding commentary) used to contrast with handguns, which are common; the key holding was the individual right to possess arms for self-defense, with the M-16 comment illustrating a boundary for potentially dangerous, military-grade weapons, though lower courts still debate its impact on modern arms."
They will counter that there are now so many AR-15s out there, they are in common use. Back to the key holding which is there is an individual right to self defense, not an individual right to arm yourself for Armageddon, or the Zombie Apocalypse, or the imaginary invasion of the US Military - Self Defense. The more you talk about needing a gun for purposes other than self defense - the less likely you are to have a right for it.
