No. of Recommendations: 4
Is it reciprocal? Does the "no more" also apply to "you people" who make accusations against people on the left, then hide from the accountability of what you say?Rhetorical calls for violence tilt disproportionately towards the left threatening the right. It's not a question, despite your running mates claiming otherwise:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/assassinati...A new survey finds an “assassination culture” growing on the American left since the attempted killing of President Donald Trump in July 2024.
Data released Monday from the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) found “48% and 55%” of “left of center” people “at least somewhat justifying murder for Elon Musk and President Trump, respectively.” The findings come after a historically violent election season in 2024, which saw two assassination attempts on Trump in July and September.Again. Not contestable. A
freaking majority of democrats supports violent action.
This board is one Nazi accusation after another. There's zero contest.
Or do you just not read any of that? I wouldn't blame you; it's all dreck.
Those people are always acting on their own, are never pushed to violence by rhetoric against liberals or progressives - so there's no need for "accountability."Because most of the time the actions are explained by pure insanity.
But the left calls out the targets it wants done away with. The modern left is a running example of Henry II's call for
Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest? with an ever-increasing allotment of crazies willing to put on their armor and rhetorically travel from England to Normandy. Chuck Schumer knew that when he stood on the steps of the Supreme Court itself and told Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh what was coming.
What do you think the NaziNAziNazi rhetoric is designed to do? Inspire hugs and flowers? Invoke lots of debate? No, dude: this has been standard operating procedure for at least 20 years.
No offense, but you will inevitably deflect and ignore the above. That's a part of the "no more". Most of the time I watch you do it and don't call you on it. And that's because most of the time arguing when the other side continually refuses to ack your points is good mental training.
But for some subjects that are serious, that ends today.
Go find me a poll similar to the one above that I showed you. Then let's talk.
And what does "no more" mean to you? What do you think should happen?I Ignore most of the liberals on this board. The reason is that they have nothing to say other than "The board's righties are ...." and life is too short to sift through their nonsense and invective.
But perhaps a blanket Ignore isn't the right way. Perhaps a better way is to pick one lib at a time, isolate the stupid things posted, and hold up those particular skunks by the tail. Then after a while pick someone else.
That's what *I* mean. You may have some projected definition that you're processing that is what you think I mean (since this board is devolving into a running conspiracy theory platform), but I just gave you a clear description.
If you're uncomfortable reading this, I'm sorry. But a Rubicon was crossed yesterday. No one knows what kind of Rubicon it was.
But for me, for here, I'll redouble my challenge to take on all comers on whatever the topic is because dialogue is the answer. That's what Charlie Kirk would have wanted.
