Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of FK | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search FK
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of FK | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search FK


Investment Strategies / Falling Knives
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15) |
Author: tecmo   😊 😞
Number: of 1023 
Subject: Re: MSFT
Date: 03/26/26 12:44 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
My biggest concern is that their profit margins are sufficiently obscene that their very very rich clients have a huge motivation to roll their own. That would take a lot of time and money, but doesn't seem impossible.

Already happening; and its taking lots of capital but Google is making in roads with its TPU chips.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46069048

Quote:
Google's real moat isn't the TPU silicon itself—it's not about cooling, individual performance, or hyper-specialization—but rather the massive parallel scale enabled by their OCS interconnects.

To quote The Next Platform: "An Ironwood cluster linked with Google’s absolutely unique optical circuit switch interconnect can bring to bear 9,216 Ironwood TPUs with a combined 1.77 PB of HBM memory... This makes a rackscale Nvidia system based on 144 “Blackwell” GPU chiplets with an aggregate of 20.7 TB of HBM memory look like a joke."

Nvidia may have the superior architecture at the single-chip level, but for large-scale distributed training (and inference) they currently have nothing that rivals Google's optical switching scalability.



tecmo
...
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15) |


Announcements
Falling Knives FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of FK | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds