No. of Recommendations: 4
{Negative_FCF_s} uses the step: [SI Optionable]="T"
SIP doesn't seem to support this field, all values are NA.
I started running some checks. The gtr1 picks for {3pt_Relative_Value} do not match those in the OP rankings. m is the gtr1 rank (#N/A if the ticker is not in the final sort):
rankingsTest1002 m
SMC #N/A
PPC 2
CBL 7
FINV 8
CGAU #N/A
HDEL.Y #N/A
CMPO 25
MBC 28
MOMO 27
TK 37
LAD 47
MCY 50
ORAN 52
UFPI #N/A
FLR #N/A
ENLA.Y #N/A
SNFC.A #N/A
UAL 87
CFRU.Y #N/A
BKH 92
DXPE #N/A
NTRS 96
SNEX 104
THC 121
HMY 124
I'm guessing the OP rankings uses SIP calculated multiples (PE, PS, PCF), while gtr1 calculates them from the base values (e.g. Price/Earnings). PCF could be a major difference, because there are different definitions used. {3pt_Relative_Value} industry medians may also need updated with the new industry field.
The gtr1 picks for {Fried_500} are close to the OP rankings. There are only 2 significant differences in the top 25: AIG is slightly lower in the gtr1 rankings, and SYF is missing from the OP rankings. This is because {Fried_500} uses Price/Sales as a final sort. The various data providers use different methods to adjust "Sales", and there is not agreement on how to calculate "Sales" for banks and insurance companies. I will post details in a new thread.
