No. of Recommendations: 5
on shrewdm. which poster personally attacks others more? WiltonKnight or wzambon
ChatGPT said:
*****************************************
I couldn’t find enough reliable data to make a definitive judgment, but here’s what the evidence suggests so far:
wzambon used a phrase like “bag of spit” when criticizing other posters.
shrewdm.com
There is little to no direct evidence in my search about WiltonKnight engaging in similarly harsh personal attacks (at least in sources I could locate).
Based on that limited sample, wzambon appears to more frequently engage in direct personal attacks.
If you like, I can try a more thorough review (e.g. scanning their posts over time) to give a stronger conclusion. Do you want me to do that?
*******************************************
You said:
yes
ChatGPT said:
Thought for 20s
Good — I did a focused, evidence-based review of their recent ShrewdM posts and summarized what I found.
What I checked (method)
I searched ShrewdM threads for recent posts by each handle and read a sample of posts and replies (politics and general boards). I looked specifically for direct personal insults (name-calling, epithets, phrases clearly targeted at other posters) versus sharp political disagreement or sarcasm (argumentative but aimed at ideas). Sources below are specific example posts I inspected.
shrewdm.com
+2
shrewdm.com
+2
Key findings (examples)
wzambon used clearly personal, insulting language in multiple posts — for example, explicitly referencing calling another poster a “bag of spit” and admitting the phrase. That is a direct personal attack.
shrewdm.com
wzambon’s posts also contain repeated derisive remarks and snark (e.g., references to “sewer” or “cultish” when describing groups), which reads as personal/tribal denigration rather than purely policy argument.
shrewdm.com
+1
WiltonKnight is argumentative and sharp in tone on policy threads, often using strong rhetoric (e.g., calling out opposing positions, sarcasm about opponents), but I found fewer examples of explicit name-calling or short-person insults in the sampled posts. His comments tend to target ideas or groups (political positions) rather than using crude personal epithets.
shrewdm.com
+2
shrewdm.com
+2
Conclusion
Based on the sampled posts I reviewed, wzambon appears to make more frequent direct personal attacks than WiltonKnight, who more often uses sharp political rhetoric and sarcasm but less direct name-calling in the examples I found.
shrewdm.com
+1
Want more?
I can do a full, systematic tally (e.g., search every post by each user in the past 2 years and count posts with direct personal insults) and return a numeric comparison and examples. Say the time window you want (e.g., last 12 months, all posts), and I’ll run it now.
*************
Sheeple, from your national debt, to your entitlement programs, to foreign policy....... you're being punished.
Just like I promised.
All you got is attacks. But not 1% of compromise.
Boom.
I'm winning. Now even the bots know you are politically bankrupt.
No. of Recommendations: 5
Now THIS is funny. I need to build a CoPilot agent to track all their insults. Would be hilarious.
No. of Recommendations: 2
I can't help you there.
I still got a VCR that is blinking 12:00 all the time.
No. of Recommendations: 11
There is little to no direct evidence in my search about WiltonKnight engaging in similarly harsh personal attacks (at least in sources I could locate).
Based on that limited sample, wzambon appears to more frequently engage in direct personal attacks.
EchBaa, what if you include your other 10 fake names? Thanks.
No. of Recommendations: 1
EchBaa, what if you include your other 10 fake names? Thanks.
***
How are they fake?
Billing you a billion in national debt for that.
Ok, done.
No. of Recommendations: 3
There is little to no direct evidence in my search about WiltonKnight engaging in similarly harsh personal attacks (at least in sources I could locate).
Based on that limited sample, wzambon appears to more frequently engage in direct personal attacks.Hey EchBaa, what if you include your other 10 screen names? Thanks.
PS
Screen addiction may lead to cognitive fatigue (“brain rot”), reduced empathy, and impaired executive function.
Increased risk of depression, anxiety, and insomnia.
Sanity is a valuable possession. Have a blessed day, blessed be the fruit.
https://www.nicklauschildrens.org/campaigns/safeso...
No. of Recommendations: 2
Now THIS is funny. I need to build a CoPilot agent to track all their insults. Would be hilarious.
Yes, put all your effort in that direction, it would be well spent.
