Post #20797 by ptheland on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

Try again.

OK. I'll make it simpler if I can.

Things have to be done in the right order. You suspect a crime, you gather evidence, then you decide if the evidence proves the crime happened. This is the order. That's what courts do every day. So let's look.

Not particularly, especially when no "crime" took place.

What you are doing here is turning things around. You say there is no "crime" so any evidence isn't credible. That's illogical.

Let's start with looking at the evidence. Is this transcript substantially accurate? If not, why do you think it's inaccurate?

--Peter

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (58)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.