Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 75964 
Subject: Re: As We Speak….
Date: 01/16/26 1:06 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
With pressure mounting in the High North, Denmark flipped the switch on Operation Arctic Endurance—a real, live, allied military exercise designed to do more than “train.” It’s about defensive readiness. It’s about permanence. It’s about making sure nobody mistakes Greenland for a bargaining chip.

To me, it also sounds like interposing some additional bodies between the U.S. and seizing Greenland.

It's the same reason Russia doesn't want NATO forces in Ukraine (or other contested countries). If there aren't any NATO forces in an area, you can move your military in without having to worry about engaging any military units from NATO - which escalates any conflict off the charts.

If you start keeping French and German troops in Greenland, even if they're a nominal force that doesn't prevent any military threat, then we can't take Greenland militarily without engaging French and German troops. Which should dispel any illusion that we could just march up and take Greenland without people regarding that as an actual act of war against not just Denmark, but NATO more broadly.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds