Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search BRK.A

Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: Knighted ✧  😊 😞
Number: of 15055 
Subject: Re: Capital allocation at Berkshire
Date: 10/25/2023 10:46 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
"Lex has hypothesised that it would be better to invest in companies the very mention of which can leave news editors dozing peacefully in their swivel chairs."

Jim, a similar thought popped into my mind recently - could there be an advantage investing in stocks of larger companies that, for whatever reason, have no/little analyst coverage.

The thought being, those less under the microscope and less widely tracked/studied may be largely ignored and could represent some hidden gems.

It's been many years, but I feel like I vaguely recall either ValueLine or SIPRO fields that track number of analysts covering.

Has anyone done backtesting on stocks having zero analyst coverage as the universe?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds