Post New

...on Christmas Day, but it's okay because they're not white and they're not Christian, they're ISIS 'scum.'

You know, the ones he claimed to have completely defeated in 2018.

Will the 'no new wars' president have to return his FIFA World Cup Peace Prize now? Or are they waitin' until he invades Venezuela?

Just askin'.

For those that have not, yet, seen the news.

NeoCons on the march.

U.S. launches strike against Islamic State forces in Nigeria, Trump says

"Tonight, at my direction as Commander in Chief, the United States launched a powerful and deadly strike against ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria, who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians, at levels not seen for many years, and even Centuries!" the president posted on his social media site.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/u-s-launches-st...

The regime screams about the Islamic boogyman in Venezuela. Venezuela has oil.

The regime screams about the Islamic boogyman in Nigeria. Nigeria has oil.

The regime screams about the Islamic boogyman in Syria. Syria is on Israel's flank, and has a bit of oil.

The Bush 43 regime screamed about the Islamic boogyman in Iraq. Iraq has oil.

I am sure that is all a coincidence. God and Savior Trump is making the world safe for Christians. The oil has nothing to do with it.

I remember my formative years in the Baptist lodge:

"Onward Christian soldier, marching as to war".

Steve...HBTT

And, on the same day:

Turkey says it arrested 115 suspected ISIS militants

The Istanbul Prosecutor’s Office said the “ISIS Armed Terrorist Organization was planning to carry out actions targeting our country, especially non-Muslim individuals, within the scope of the upcoming Christmas and New Year events,” according to CNN.

https://thehill.com/policy/international/5663301-t...

His nibs complains the boogyman in Nigeria was targeting Christians (reportedly not true, as they were attacking Muslims too) and Turkey makes the same claim, the same day: boogyman threat to non-Muslims.

Thing is, I don't know what to make of this. Is the Islamic boogyman ascendant? Ir are the clearly ascendant NeoCons using the same playbook they used 20 years ago: make the mob so frightened of the boogyman, they don't resist increasing police state tactics at home, and increasing wars abroad?

Steve

No wonder there are calls for his impeachment. I just saw some video today. It won't go anywhere with Reps in charge. But illegal strikes is pretty good justification. Congress rescinded the authority for POTUS to strike at will (after 25 years!). So these actions are illegal, and probably impeachable.

No wonder there are calls for his impeachment. I just saw some video today. It won't go anywhere with Reps in charge. But illegal strikes is pretty good justification. Congress rescinded the authority for POTUS to strike at will (after 25 years!). So these actions are illegal, and probably impeachable. - 1pg

I know you hate Trump so you keep saying this because you need it to be illegal, but that is certainly debatable....

"The Afghanistan War was not formally declared by Congress; instead, it was initiated under the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) passed shortly after the September 11 attacks in 2001. This allowed the U.S. to engage in military action against those responsible for the attacks, primarily targeting al-Qaeda and the Taliban."

"The U.S. invasion of Panama in December 1989 was not officially declared as a war by Congress; instead, it was termed "Operation Just Cause." The U.S. government justified the invasion by citing the need to protect American citizens and restore democracy in Panama."

"The U.S. invasion of Grenada in 1983 was not officially declared as a war by Congress; instead, it was conducted under the code name "Operation Urgent Fury" and was justified by President Reagan as a necessary action to protect American citizens and counter perceived threats from the Soviet Union and Cuba. The invasion faced significant criticism for lacking formal congressional approval."

Also Korea and Vietnam and Iraq were likewise undeclared.

U.S. launches strike against Islamic State forces in Nigeria, Trump says

Killing for Christ on Christmas.

Trump, cementing his support among the Christo-fascists and Islamophobes.

I suspect that, once again, this strike is performative and probably does nothing but gain recruits for ISIS.

I know you hate Trump so you keep saying this because you need it to be illegal, but that is certainly debatable....

It isn't illegal, there's an authorization still there, but even if it wasn't there I wouldn't call it illegal. There's a tension between the Executive and Legislative on War Powers - which only Congress has. So the President better get whatever he wants done in 30-60 days.

I know you hate Trump so you keep saying this because you need it to be illegal, but that is certainly debatable....

As I recall, Congress last spring/summer removed much of the 2002 authorization for military action by POTUS. If something is left, then -as you say- its illegality is debatable. I was under the impression they had rescinded it. In which case, he has to run it by Congress first.

The Afghanistan war, and also Iraq, were waged under the 2002 authorization (so, arguably, legal). I am aware that we have not declared war since 1941. Korea and Vietnam should have required such a declaration. Panama and Grenada may have been "protecting American citizens", or not. I do remember those, and the justifications for them. They were always a little sketchy**. The UN condemned them as they violated the UN charter.



**The medical students in Grenada initially said they were not under threat, when interviewed. I actually remember that interview; I used to watch Nightline consistently.

NeoCons on the march.

And more:

Trump says US 'knocked out a big facility' where drug ships are manufactured

President Trump claimed Friday morning that the U.S. military struck a "big plant" that was allegedly involved in assiting drug operations.

According to the president, the U.S. military destroyed a facility where ships that transport deadly drugs to America are built.

"We just knocked out ... a big plant to - a big facility where they send the, you know, where the ships come from," the president added. "Two nights ago, we knocked that out, so we hit them very hard."

Trump did not specify exactly where the strike occurred, and didn't say whether it took place on the Venezuelan mainland.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-says-us...

You can't miss the parallels between the regime talking points about Venezuela, and the NeoCon talking points about Iraq: Islamic boogyman and WMDs.

Steve

You can't miss the parallels between the regime talking points about Venezuela, and the NeoCon talking points about Iraq: Islamic boogyman and WMDs.

Steve

-------------------------------

Remind me again why you liberals are so hands off Venezula/Maduro/cartels in your condemnation of Trumps efforts to clean up the neighborhood?

Maduro is a bad guy, an unelected bad guy who supports our international adversaries and suppresses the Venezuelan people who would otherwise be our ally. Why do you resist every effort to curtail his capacity to make trouble?

Maduro is a bad guy,

The former President of Honduras, the one Trump just pardoned, was a "bad guy" too. What's your point?

Steve

>>Maduro is a bad guy,<<

The former President of Honduras, the one Trump just pardoned, was a "bad guy" too. What's your point?

Steve

----------------

What is your point? Are we are somehow better off by allowing Maduro's behavior to continue because you think it hurts Trump's image and therefore the MAGA movement?

Maduro is a bad guy, an unelected bad guy who supports our international adversaries and suppresses the Venezuelan people who would otherwise be our ally. Why do you resist every effort to curtail his capacity to make trouble?

Let me reframe that for you:

Trump is a bad guy, a barely elected bad guy who supports our international adversaries and suppresses the American people. Why do you resist every effort to curtail his capacity to make trouble?

You can't miss the parallels between the regime talking points about Venezuela, and the NeoCon talking points about Iraq: Islamic boogyman and WMDs.

Steve

-------------------------------

"Remind me again why you liberals are so hands off Venezula/Maduro/cartels in your condemnation of Trumps efforts to clean up the neighborhood?

Maduro is a bad guy, an unelected bad guy who supports our international adversaries and suppresses the Venezuelan people who would otherwise be our ally. Why do you resist every effort to curtail his capacity to make trouble?" - BHM

Mike, you are demonstrating his point. You are using words that were used by the NeoCons back then. Saddam was also a bad guy with a capacity to make trouble.

Well at least we know your America First talk was bullshit. America First means you will support whatever Trump says is America First because that is a requirement of being in the Cult.

What is truly weird though is that there are other people who are bad guys. Some of these bad guys, like Putin, even have even a greater capacity to cause trouble than Maduro, yet you are not clamoring to have Trump curtail his capacity to make trouble. In fact, you regularly support having the U.S. give in to Putin. There is a clear lack of consistency to your views other than you will support whatever Trump wants no matter how illogically inconsistent. That is very cultish.

My question to you is other than blindly supporting whatever Trump wants internationally. How do you pick and choose whatever bad guys you think the U.S. should help clean up?

"Remind me again why you liberals are so hands off Venezula/Maduro/cartels in your condemnation of Trumps efforts to clean up the neighborhood?

Maduro is a bad guy, an unelected bad guy who supports our international adversaries and suppresses the Venezuelan people who would otherwise be our ally. Why do you resist every effort to curtail his capacity to make trouble?" - BHM

It should also be noted that I think most liberals would support curtailing Maduro's capacity to cause trouble throughout the world if it was done in a clear and legal manner. In fact, I would bet many of America's allies would support such actions.

However randomly blowing up poor, dumb part time fishermen in speedboats (especially with second strikes), isn't really curtailing Maduro and justly causes commendation of the U.S. in the international community. Same thing with grabbing "shadow fleet" tankers. There is a right way and there is a wrong way of doing things. Why do you always support Trump doing things the wrong way? You keep demonstrating that you do not believe in law and order.

Remind me again why you liberals are so hands off Venezula/Maduro/cartels in your condemnation of Trumps efforts to clean up the neighborhood?

Glad I read ahead. Umm captured the heart of it. It's about what is legal. Once you allow government to push the line on what is legal, it's difficult to get it back. To reference literature, the principles on the barn door that we thought were there, suddenly aren't. We cannot allow that.

I have no love for Maduro or the cartels. They can all burn in hell for all I care. I do care about how we behave. We can oppose the cartels, and Maduro, without breaking our laws, or international law.

It fascinates me how certain people can point to a problem and say “Wow, Huge problem” and then do nothing about it.

Fentanyl and other drugs kill upwards of 100k Americans a year. Why isn’t everyone cheering blowing these boats up?

Oh, right. Need to follow laws. Welp, when we would off people - including American citizens -
With drones we certainly didn’t hear that.

Then there’s the “must defend democracy” trope they use. Let’s state for the record that Maduro LOST his last election by a landslide and shouldn’t be recognized as Venezuela’s leader.

However randomly blowing up poor, dumb part time fishermen in speedboats... - Umm

------------------

Nothing dumb about them if they have figured out how to catch fish without using tackle or nets....

Maduro is a bad guy Trump is a bad guy.

an unelected bad guy Trump tried to steal an election.

who supports our international adversaries Trump supports Putin - another bad guy. Trump likes bad guys.

and suppresses the Venezuelan people who would otherwise be our ally.

Republicans believe in suppression, 1. voter suppression - the fewer people that vote the better for Republicans.

I think you need to read some Latin American history. Chavez didn't get along with Bush and called him the devil.

Why do you resist every effort to curtail his capacity to make trouble?" - BHM

We don't. We didn't resist in the past. We are entering a new era of gunboat diplomacy, or drugboat diplomacy if you prefer.

Your characterization "Trumps efforts to clean up the neighborhood" would be humorous if we didn't have such richly bad past. Remember St Reagan? We instituted a coup de tat in 1954 in Guatemala and later Reagan proclaimed Montt who lead the Mayan Genocide to be "a man of great personal integrity" who was "totally dedicated to democracy", and "a fine Christian man". No one believes Trump is interested in cleaning up the neighborhood. You can paint that mule white, but it's still a mule, and it might be the mule from hell.

What is your point? Are we are somehow better off by allowing Maduro's behavior to continue because you think it hurts Trump's image and therefore the MAGA movement?

As others on this thread have noted, that mindset is pure NeoCon, right out of the "Plan For A New American Century": enforce "Pax Americana" around the world, at bayonet point.

Folks are tired of it, and tired of paying for military adventures everywhere. That is why Trump campaigned on "America First", before he ran away from it, and became a NeoCon in everything but name.

Steve

"However randomly blowing up poor, dumb part time fishermen in speedboats (especially with second strikes), isn't really curtailing Maduro and justly causes commendation of the U.S. in the international community." - Dumbass me.

commendation = condemnation.

Spellcheck sometimes isn't your friend.

Nothing dumb about them if they have figured out how to catch fish without using tackle or nets....


We can add Little ummie to the list of people that think you can fish out of submarines.

Maduro is a bad guy ~BHM

Like pedophile bad?...

"Happy Birthday Jeffrey and may every day be another wonderful secret." ~Trump, pedophile, president

Like pedophile bad?...

But he's killing "terrorists" and Muslims, running brown people out of Shinyland and making it "safe" to be Christian, so his personal peccadilloes don't matter, right? Squirrel! Squirrel!! Squirrel!!!


Steve

Steve203: ...his personal peccadilloes don't matter, right?

Raping -- or enabling others to rape -- 15-, 16-, and 17-year old girls is not a peccadillo.

Raping -- or enabling others to rape -- 15-, 16-, and 17-year old girls is not a peccadillo.

I should have put sarcasm tags on that post. The point being, the closer that mudstorm swirls, the more extreme his diversionary tactics will be.

Steve

they're ISIS 'scum.'

Exactly, I have no problem with that, why do you?
When did ISIS follow rules of war?
Why then should we?
Thank goodness we have President Trump who takes
no sh’t from any rogue group or country.
Thank goodness we no longer have the senile old fool
Joe Biden in the WH.

LurkerMom: Exactly, I have no problem with that, why do you?

Because he was killing people on Christmas Day, you moron.

"Donald Trump bombed a hospital on Christmas, take that woke Jesus!" ~Newsmax

Lurker Mom,

In addition to Biden's being a senile fool,

let's all remember he was a sleazy plagiarizing fool corrupt machine politician from Delaware for his entire career, and the senility as President was simply the cherry on the top of the crap cake that is Joe Biden.

Why do the Democrats insist of putting up such awful candidates?

Why do the Democrats insist of putting up such awful candidates?

Because corporate interests flood the system with so much money that their choice wins? At least he wasn't as bad as Hillary.

Steve...remembers that plagiarism charge from decades ago.

When did ISIS follow rules of war?
Why then should we?

Those burglars don’t follow the law when they rob my house, why should I? I’ll just shoot ‘em myself instead of letting the courts handle it. And I’ll shoot their families, too, as vengeance. That’ll show ‘em.

And that guy speeding recklessly down the highway-I’ll handle that myself, too. I’ll follow him to his destination and slash his tires. That will keep him from speeding.

The shoplifter? I’ll chase her down and give her a good beating in the parking lot to teach her a lesson.

They’re not following the law. Why should I?

—Peter

Fentanyl and other drugs kill upwards of 100k Americans a year. Why isn’t everyone cheering blowing these boats up?

Guns kill 47k Americans a year and are leading cause of death for young people (ages 1-17). Why isn’t everyone cheering stricter gun laws - you wouldn’t even have to blow things up?

Because he was killing people on Christmas Day, you moron

Since when did you Heathens care about Christmas Day to another?

"Donald Trump bombed a hospital on Christmas, take that woke Jesus!" ~Newsmax

Where is your link?

SNIP
“In a dramatic escalation during the holiday season, the United States carried out a Christmas Day strike on ISIS targets in Nigeria, in coordination with Nigerian security forces. The operation, attributed to the Trump administration’s aggressive counter-terror posture, reportedly led to the elimination of multiple ISIS militants, dealing a major blow to terror networks operating in West Africa.”

from CNN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdFp0yJ5Wr4

Why do the Democrats insist of putting up such awful candidates?

Because the dems do not have anyone with an ounce of brain.
The dems are leaderless, wandering around like senile Biden.

Those burglars don’t follow the law when they rob my house, why should I? I’ll just shoot ‘em myself instead of letting the courts handle it

That’s not a great example. If some burglar breaks into your house and you feel like you’re life is in danger, you are well within the law to take whatever steps you deem necessary as you have no duty to retreat in that case.

Guns kill 47k Americans a year and are leading cause of death for young people (ages 1-17). Why isn’t everyone cheering stricter gun laws - you wouldn’t even have to blow things up?

Are foreign entities behind the guns killing Americans?

No.

Fentanyl and other drugs kill upwards of 100k Americans a year. Why isn’t everyone cheering blowing these boats up?


This has been pointed out before, but cultists do not listen and learn. Whatever the orange God says is what they will believe. The reality:

Virtually no illicit fentanyl in the U.S. comes from Venezuela. According to U.S. and international drug enforcement agencies, Venezuela plays an insignificant role, if any, in the production or trafficking of fentanyl to the United States.

Fentanyl and other drugs kill upwards of 100k Americans a year. Why isn’t everyone cheering blowing these boats up?

We've gone over this, Fentanyl is not on those boats, it;s manufactured mostly in Mexico.

"Illicit fentanyl entering the United States is primarily
manufactured in clandestine laboratories in Mexico by transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), using precursor chemicals largely sourced from China."

But to a serial liar and gas lighter, such as Dope Goebbels, that means nothing.

If some burglar breaks into your house and you feel like you’re life is in danger, you are well within the law to take whatever steps you deem necessary as you have no duty to retreat in that case.

Most states now use the castle doctrine or stand your ground, so there's no duty to retreat inside the home, some have a reasonable force requirement, but Massachusetts still has an enforced duty to retreat.

Fentanyl and other drugs kill upwards of 100k Americans a year. Why isn’t everyone cheering blowing these boats up?
Guns kill 47k Americans a year and are leading cause of death for young people (ages 1-17). Why isn’t everyone cheering stricter gun laws - you wouldn’t even have to blow things up?

I made a similar observation a few weeks ago in response to the demented orange asshole's claim that saving lives from the scourge of substance abuse was the motivation for bombing pangas.

Alcohol abuse is responsible for at least 125,000 deaths a year in the US, and who knows how many homes are wrecked. So why isn't the orange asshole bombing whiskey central (Kentucky and Tennessee)... and his own winery while he's at it?

Illicit fentanyl entering the United States

On land or sea, it doesn’t matter. President Trump is going after illicit drugs
destine for America. That is what matters, not the nit-picking where and how the left trying
to make a big deal over.

On land or sea, it doesn’t matter. President Trump is going after illicit drugs destine for America.

Ah, that explains why Trump pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras, who was convicted in a U.S. court of conspiring to import more than 400 tons of cocaine into the United States and related firearms offenses. Prosecutors described the operation as one of the "largest and most violent drug-trafficking conspiracies in the world".

Did you know that the word gullible is listed in the dictionary twice?

Ah, that explains why Trump pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras,

The Trump pick in the recent Honduran election "won", when the totals finally came out "right".

Trump-backed candidate Nasry Asfura declared winner of Honduras' presidential vote

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — Trump-backed candidate Nasry Asfura won Honduras' presidential election, electoral authorities said Wednesday afternoon, ending a weeks-long count that has whittled away at the credibility of the Central American nation's fragile electoral system.

Asfura, of the conservative National Party received 40.27% of the vote in the Nov. 30, edging out four-time candidate Salvador Nasralla of the conservative Liberal Party, who finished with 39.53% of the vote.

https://www.npr.org/2025/12/25/g-s1-103680/nasry-a...

Steve

I made a similar observation a few weeks ago in response to the demented orange asshole's claim that saving lives from the scourge of substance abuse was the motivation for bombing pangas.

And his bullshit is belied by his pardoning the former President of Honduras who was responsible for smuggling 400 TONS of cocaine into the US.

The cultists will go along with any bullshit that Donny spews. It's as if they lost the ability to THINK.

Ah, that explains why Trump pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras, who was convicted in a U.S. court of conspiring to import more than 400 tons of cocaine into the United States and related firearms offenses. Prosecutors described the operation as one of the "largest and most violent drug-trafficking conspiracies in the world".

No matter how many times this has been pointed out to LM and Dope, they forge ahead with their Donny loving bullshit. The will to believe is strong in the cult.

But to a serial liar and gas lighter, such as Dope Goebbels, that means nothing.

*Signs on the dotted line*

Great. I own you now.

No matter how many times this has been pointed out to LM and Dope, they forge ahead with their Donny loving bullshit. The will to believe is strong in the cult.

Just think, you and the TDS clan here will be tormented by President Trump for
three more years. It’s a comedy break for me to read the but, but, but replies.
😁

Just think, you and the TDS clan here will be tormented by President Trump for
three more years. It’s a comedy break for me to read the but, but, but replies.

Whenever I read screeds like the one you replied to I’m reminded of just how many pets we have in our menagerie.

Are foreign entities behind the guns killing Americans?
No.

Understood, American lives are worth saving primarily if videos of foreigners being blown up can be run on TV.

Understood, American lives are worth saving primarily if videos of foreigners being blown up can be run on TV.

Yeah, not really. The point of that was your equivalence didn’t work.

Just think, you and the TDS clan here will be tormented by President Trump for
three more years.

I don't think so. Can you and dope muster the same level of enthusiasm for Vance?

"When did ISIS follow rules of war?
Why then should we?" LurkerMom

The fact that you even think this is a legitimate question says a whole lot about you and your character as a human being. You really are a despicable person.

What's the problem?

According to the people Trump killed, next stop: Paradise!

Maybe it was a "hospital." I.e. a terror base using a what-used-to-be-a-real-hospital as cover.

AOC in 2028!!!!!

D-Umm D-Umm,

What rules of war are you claiming the United States supposedly violated?

The ones the Great Gazoo whispered in your ear?

Gun laws and enforcement of gun laws are systematically racist.

Everyone knows that a hugely disproportionate (in comparison to their representation in the overall population) of gun crimes are committed by young Black males.

More gun laws, and stricter enforcement of those laws, creates a systemic disparate impact against the Black community.

Everyone knows that. The legal system is systemically racist.

According to the Left, disparate impact = systemic racism.

And that's precisely why those deep blue cities with the strictest gun laws also have the most gun crime, most of it committed by young Black males.

Why should they be expected to enforce the racist system that they created?

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.

Q.E.D.

LurkerMom,

Their torture will continue for 7 more years, not just 3.


Trump is GREAT in '28!!!!!

Dope1,

It's a menagerie but they shouldn't be regarded as "pets" (i.e. implication is domesticated, safe, peaceful, etc., like a hamster or a parakeet).

They are more like wild feces-throwing monkeys who have been infected by a new form of rabies-like Corona virus which they got from stealing raw bat meat from the Wuhan wet market.

When did ISIS follow rules of war? Why then should we?

Try this on for size: Because we're better than they are! At least, we used to be.

The fact that you even think this is a legitimate question says a whole lot about you and your character as a human being. You really are a despicable person.

LOL....Here comes Umm, that bitter grumpy old man with nothing to add to the
conversation except his insults and smelly demeanor.

Yep, Umm, another one of my comic relief misfits at the Policy Board.
Thanks Umm, you are good for something....laughs 🤣

Yep, Umm, another one of my comic relief misfits at the Policy Board.

dumm and butthurt is no way to go through life.

Try this on for size: Because we're better than they are! At least, we used to be.

And what did being the nice guy get us?
Answer: Dead American Soldiers.

LurkerMom,

It's even more "LOL" if, when D'Umm-D'Umm calls someone "despicable," you picture him saying it as would Sylvester the Cat (Tweety Bird's nemesis) "That's DESHPICKUBUL!!! and getting his slobber all over everything.

Dope1,

D'ummm - D'ummm is only butthurt (your term) because he insists on repeatedly sitting on sharp pointy objects.

In fact, he rather seems to enjoy it!

Moreover, the Leftoid's claim that the U.S. should act or not act in a particular manner under particular circumstances,
"because WE are BETTER than THEY are" is a ridiculously subjective standard.

THEY obviously think THEY are BETTER than WE are.

Dude thinks he is posting on instagram or facebook (or shrewdm) and outcomes in the real world (which doesn't exist for Lalapzoodledoodle) don't matter.

They do matter.

"What rules of war are you claiming the United States supposedly violated?" - Marco the Russian Clown

I know it is silly to argue with a Russian Troll who is destined to die in a ditch in Ukraine because all you will do is play dumb like you did in the SCOTUS ruling thread.

But I will give you one clue and then go back to treating you like the Russian Clown you are and laughing at you comrade.....

Striking men clinging to a capsized broken boat in the middle of an ocean who are not a direct threat to anyone is most definitely a violation of war.

Striking men clinging to a capsized broken boat in the middle of an ocean who are not a direct threat to anyone is most definitely a violation of war.

Oh look, Umm expressing sympathy for drug runners.🙄

You might have a point, Sc'Ummm.

Maybe the U.S. should change strategy to fund lots of abortion clinics to eliminate the Venezuelan babies before they can even be born to grow up to become drug runners.

You guys are O.K. with killing unborn fetuses, right?

Not a war crime.

Moreover, the Leftoid's claim that the U.S. should act or not act in a particular manner under particular circumstances,
"because WE are BETTER than THEY are" is a ridiculously subjective standard.

We have generally adhered to those OBJECTIVE standards, at least until this administration, which seems hellbent on removing those standards.

And it was adherence to those objective standards that made us better.

Increasingly, that era should be viewed in the past tense.

We have generally adhered to those OBJECTIVE standards, at least until this administration, which seems hellbent on removing those standards.

And it was adherence to those objective standards that made us better.


Have we, now. Methinks thou dost forget a few things. Most recently the liberal use of drones in the Middle East.

I’m not sure why so many liberals are comfortable with parachuting into a message board and just instilling people. Or starting threads with no purpose other than to complain about other people.

But these are libs, and for many of them liberalism is a mental disorder.

Dope1,

It's "Rob Reiner" syndrome.

They are extremely privileged or believe themselves to be--or otherwise view themselves as "special"--and from that perch of superiority, deign to improve others with their cock eyed judgments.

Meanwhile, back at home, it's a literal lunatic asylum.

The fact that you even think this is a legitimate question says a whole lot about you and your character as a human being. You really are a despicable person.

These MAGA xtians have now convinced themselves they have a heavenly hall-pass from God to kill those they deem evil.

Striking men clinging to a capsized broken boat in the middle of an ocean who are not a direct threat to anyone is most definitely a violation of war.

Hegseth has them big'ol xtian icons on his chest, so it must be okay to kill for god....he answers first and last to 'god'.. not laws that are acted upon by non-americans.

Post New

US Policy FAQ

---

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.