Post #13467 by Boater on the US Policy board

When reading posts, there are yellow stars against the names of the most respected Shrewds. The number of points in the star, starting at 3, represents the Shrewd'm-Star rating. This number is the average recommendation that the author received over the last 12 months.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (70)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

"But he didn't do that. Instead, he lied. He told them that he had returned all of the relevant documents, and then took steps to hide the ones he kept. Which is a pretty solid indication that: i) neither he nor his lawyers actually felt that there was any basis for a claim that he could keep government records in the face of a demand they be returned; and ii) he intended to wrongfully retain the ones he wanted to keep, rather than "exercise a right to test this in court."

If he was unaware of what was there because ...he... did not pack it up then your point is not well taken. He has chosen to go to court, this for you as a lawyer shold be a good decision

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (70)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.