Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Macro


Personal Finance Topics / Macroeconomic Trends and Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 3852 
Subject: Re: 6-3 Scotus Decision Strikes Down Trump Tariffs
Date: 02/21/26 12:45 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
Increasing U.S. consumption taxes is sensible.

Consumption taxes are regressive. People with low incomes spend a far higher percent of income on basic needs, while wealthy people put it in the bank, or use it to buy services, which are (by and large) not subject to tariffs, often not to taxes.

My daily massage is untaxed, as is my regular visit from the gardener or my pool boy, but my pool boy, gardener, and massage person pays consumption taxes on the food they, uh, consume, the clothes they buy, and most everything else they need to do their jobs.

Somehow doesn’t seem quite fair, does it?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends and Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds