Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search MI
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search MI


Investment Strategies / Mechanical Investing
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (28) |
Author: rayvt   😊 😞
Number: of 5384 
Subject: Re: Long time reader, infrequent poster
Date: 10/13/25 12:04 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
Do you have the data to backtest your VONG?

No I don't.

This was really a gut decision. Large cap & growth & large cap growth have been very profitable asset classes for a long time. That in itself deserves a close look. I remember a Ken Fisher column in Forbes about 30 years ago which said that large cap was the best class.

I figured that since the top 10 holdings are the bulk of the total weighting that they drive the return and the other 350+ stocks are also-rans and are responsible for very little of the returns.
The #11 company is only 1.7% weight.

(Heh, when I was looking just now one of the sidebar links was "4 months ago - VONG: Not The Time To Bet On Growth - Seeking Alpha". VONG is up 14.62% in that time.)

The first time I bought the top 10 in the same relative weighing. That was a PITA.

And Jim keeps saying that equal weight is better. So the next time I just went equal weight.



I use a similar screen using NAS100 but I would like to expand the universe.

It's the same top 10 holdings. Russell 1000, VONG, S&P500, QQQ ...... all have about the same top 10 stocks.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (28) |


Announcements
Mechanical Investing FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of MI | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds