Post #1420 by Aussi on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4)

Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

There was a question about out of sample timing results in Post 1415. The post has been removed and I can't remember the posters name to ask if he found out the answer.

Craig

Print the post

Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

Post 1415 has oddly disappeared. Maybe the author requested its removal. There was an earlier thread about NHNL use:

"If I were to test how the BCCs have done post-discovery, what start year should I use? I believe 2010 was the first full year that all 3 BCCs could be used for market timing."
https://www.shrewdm.com/MB?pid=587083108&wholeThre...

Print the post

Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

One of the three, the "99 day rule" or "no new highs lately", dates from this post 2008-09-27
http://www.datahelper.com/mi/search.phtml?nofool=y...

Jim

Print the post

Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 5

The most important historical posts about the BCs are on the FAQ timing methods page - http://mechinvesting.wikidot.com/timing-methods

FC

Print the post

Post New

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.