Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of STEM | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search STEM
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of STEM | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search STEM


Outskirts of Shrewd'm / Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 221 
Subject: Re: unified field theory
Date: 04/20/2025 2:19 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
I was only loosely familiar with string theory. There was no class in grad school for it, but it was discussed on occasion (usually outside of the classroom). I didn't know any professors working on it.

From what I gathered at the time, they constructed an idea, and the did the math. The math seemed to give them the answer they were looking for. On the surface, I'm OK with that. It was decades before GR could be verified after the math had been worked out (there were some earlier tests, but the "clincher" wasn't until 1954 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_rel...). But that is the trick...it could -in principle- be verified when Einstein first proposed it (he even proposed the tests). String theory has never suggested a mode to test it.

If it can't be falsified, it isn't useful. Whether "string theory" or a deity, doesn't matter.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of STEM | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds