Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In March 2025, in the thread "Re: OT, out", Umm asked the members: "Do you think it is because America is made up of magical soil that makes businesses based in America magically profitable?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: weatherman ✹  😊 😞
Number: of 4581 
Subject: 2 big ones
Date: 08/08/26 11:04 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
have been pondering (for practical reasons) 2 big macro questions not narrowed to the current economic cycle (regardless if it can be called 'normal').

has the gop
1. significantly knocked re\friendshoring industrialization off track?
(neutralize\normalize shorter-term AI frenzy in this definition)
as learned from covid, commodity\refining, etc...the # of vulnerable points seem endless.
this is simply considering deglobalization, not a zeihan-type china collapse scenario.

2. broken the pillars beyond fixable for 1-3 more potus cycles?
one take here:
bonddad.blogspot.com - Has america become extractive economy

i leave with this related comment from substack :
"There is no discussion of whether or not we are in an AI bubble. We are. The question isn’t when it ends, but what happens [to many equities] when it does.
There is no discussion of whether or not the US is in serious fiscal trouble. It is. The question isn’t whether it will debase its currency to try and fudge the numbers, only how it will do it.
There is no discussion of whether or not the world is fracturing into a multi-polar setup which we haven’t truly experienced in over 80 years. The question isn’t where the next conflict breaks out, but what it means for the supply chains we have come to depend upon.
You may believe whatever you want, but I believe that this is not an environment which is particularly favorable to passive funds over the next decade or two..."
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to weatherman here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,571 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community