Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (48) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 75974 
Subject: Re: healthcare
Date: 11/12/25 12:13 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Certainly something to consider, but there are definitely better ways of analysing the comparative value/effectiveness of health care systems.

I do remember you talking about that, yes.
And similar to this thought is giving the side-eye to a straight up comparison of health outcomes, because such an analysis rides on the assumption that the inputs to the health care system - i.e. the patients that use it - are the same between the US and Canada.

They're not.

https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/news/united-st...

Look at how much more lung disease and coronary heart disease Americans have. That's not because most of America works down in a coal mine or inhales asbestos regularly. Canadians live healthier lifestyles that we do - they get outside more, get more exercise and don't eat as much processed junk as we do.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (48) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds