Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 42586 
Subject: Re: 51st thru 60th States
Date: 03/08/2025 2:54 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
storehouse of useless minutiae since at least LBJ

But that did partially answer the question, so not really useless. :-)

Still don't know why they settled on 433, allowing for two more for AZ and NM. And why did they not allow for two more with AK and HI? They did temporarily, but then cut it back again.

If we hypothetically absorbed Canada, you would think you would need at least a few new representatives. But we'd have to reapportion back to 435, which seems to arbitrary.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds