Post #12142 by Mark on the Berkshire Hathaway board

If the Frequently Answered Questions (FAQ) is not available for your board (the link to the FAQ is shown always below each post whilst reading it), send one to Shrewd'm using the contact link

- Manlobbi

Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 0

Bigger isn't (statistically speaking) better

Maybe bigger IS statistically better. For example, how often does the S&P500 remove the bigger stock when compared to the smaller stocks? Maybe the 100 smallest stocks in the S&P500 do better than the 100 largest ones, not because the 100 smallest ones are better, but rather because the 100 smallest ones are culled more often?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (33)

Prev | Next

Announcements

Berkshire Hathaway FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.